On 13 Feb 2013, at 01:30, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote: Why don't you run lmf and have a look what it thinks you've done? Commands are the same as for vms. My understanding is that -END gives you endnode functionality. -EXT I cannot remember. I did that and I then noticed I reversed ISSUER and PRODUCER. ;) -----Original Message----- From: Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:04:09 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE<hecnet at Update.UU.SE> Reply-To: hecnet at Update.UU.SECc: hecnet at Update.UU.SE<hecnet at Update.UU.SE> Subject: Re: [HECnet] DECnet-Plus on Tru64 On 12 Feb 2013, at 23:58, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote: On 02/12/2013 11:54 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: You are not trying to use VMS licenses on Tru64unix, are you? They aren't compatible, unfortunately. You need real Tru64 licenses. I am using Tru64 licenses...I just don't know the license names I need...the documentation seems to not be fond of saying... Can you run "strings" on the binary and see if you can find out what it wants? Ran it on the binaries, the libraries, and finally found the licenses mentioned in a shell script that is part of the kernel module rebuild procedure. I loaded those and NCL still complains...maybe I need to reinstall the subsets? This ain't Windows, man. There's gotta be something else going on. Maybe I need to recompile the kernel? ;) I think there is an in-kernel license cache of some sort...perhaps not having the licenses loaded at install affected the way the module was built? Has to either be that, a trailing space, or incorrect license names. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA