OK, there are two new changesets. One to fix the missing update and one to fix the warnings on format strings. Regards Rob -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Mark Wickens Sent: 09 September 2012 08:13 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE; mark at wickensonline.co.uk Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing Rob, I had a go compiling version 15891 <https://route20.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/15891> of the source code under Ubuntu 12.04. I downloaded and built version 1.3.0 of libpcap. I got the following compiler error. Are there some changes you need to commit to the repository? Regards, Mark. <https://route20.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/15891>msw at x60: ~/Downloads/Main/Route20$ OS_CCDEFS="-I/usr/local/include" OS_LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" make cc - I . -I/usr/local/include adjacency.c area_forwarding_database.c area_routing_database.c circuit.c decision.c decnet.c dns.c eth_circuit.c eth_decnet.c eth_init_layer.c eth_pcap.c eth_sock.c forwarding.c forwarding_database.c init_layer.c linux.c messages.c node.c packet.c route20.c routing_database.c socket.c timer.c update.c -o route20 - L/usr/local/lib -lpcap circuit.c: In function 'CircuitCreateEthernetPcap': circuit.c:65:9: error: 'struct circuit' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' circuit.c: In function 'CircuitCreateEthernetSocket': circuit.c:84:9: error: 'struct circuit' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' decision.c: In function 'DumpHeading': decision.c:214:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security] decision.c:222:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security] decision.c:230:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security] linux.c: In function 'Log': linux.c:157:6: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security] update.c: In function 'ProcessCircuitLevel1Update': update.c:82:25: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' update.c:86:53: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' update.c:89:50: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' update.c:100:10: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' update.c:100:37: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' update.c:102:16: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' update.c:105:9: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' update.c:105:36: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node' make: *** [route20] Error 1 On 09/09/12 00:07, Rob Jarratt wrote: The source code has been updated on CodePlex to fix both issues. It now generates level 1 routing messages, so will work correctly if you have level 1 routers in your area. It also handles unreachable nodes in its own area correctly now. Regards Rob -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner- hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt Sent: 08 September 2012 16:43 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing I have already realised that there is at least one deficiency. If you have any Level 1 routers in your area then it isn't going to work properly because it doesn't send out Level 1 Routing messages (but it does process the ones it receives). I have also had a report that when nodes in my area are not reachable, you get a timeout instead of an "unreachable" error. Regards Rob -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner- hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt Sent: 08 September 2012 14:12 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing If you want to try routing directly to me, my config is jarratt.dyndns.org:4711. I will need to know your details for the link to work. Regards Rob -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner- hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger Sent: 08 September 2012 12:35 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing Excellent! I'll download and play when I have some free time!! -brian On Sep 8, 2012, at 4:04, "Rob Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote: I have published everything up on CodePlex now. Here is the link: https://route20.codeplex.com/ Regards Rob -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner- hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger Sent: 08 September 2012 00:38 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing Ok, but where do we find the source? :) -brian On 9/7/2012 6:36 PM, Rob Jarratt wrote: I am ready for a couple of people to try out the user mode DECnet router I have been writing. Is anyone interested in trying it out? You will need to be able to compile C code and have pcap or winpcap installed. Here is an extract from the README: User Mode DECnet Router Readme ============================== This program is a DECnet router that implements version 2.0 of the DECnet routing specification found here: http://linux-decnet.sourceforge.net/docs/route20.txt Features -------- 1. Runs on Windows either as a Windows Service, or as a console program. 2. Runs on Linux as a daemon. 3. Full routing capability, so it avoids broadcasting all routing messages to entire network and kills looping packets. 4. Supports Ethernet (using pcap/winpcap). 5. Supports Johnny's bridge. 6. Can be extended to support other kinds of circuit (Cisco and Multinet might be examples, not tried). 7. Does dynamic DNS updates without blocking. Limitations ----------- 1. Only tested on Windows Server 2003 and Raspberry Pi running Debian. 2. Does not support Phase III nodes. 3. Although it can be configured as a Level 1 node, Level 1 is not fully supported. It has only been tested as a Level 2 (area router) node. 4. Limited testing on Raspberry Pi. 5. Performance not tested. 6. Not tested with multiple ethernets. 7. Limited testing with multiple bridges. Regards Rob -- http://www.wickensonline.co.uk http://declegacy.org.uk http://retrochallenge.net https://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo