On 10/02/2013 06:09 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: There is MicroEMACS, which is really easy to port around (I have it running on RSX). I used MicroEMACS when I did a lot of DOS development in the 1980s. I also ran it for awhile (until I got GNU Emacs built) on a 3B1. Then I ran across an amazingly nice emacs implementation called "Freemacs". It's DOS-only, written in assembler, but like GNU Emacs, it is just an editor core plus primitives, with higher-level functions written in an interpreted language. Freemacs' language is called "Mint", and it's sorta Lisp-like, but not really Lisp. (one could say that GNU Emacs' elisp isn't really Lisp either, but..) If you do anything DOS-related at all, and are an emacs person, I recommend Freemacs wholeheartedly. It really is very, very nice. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA