On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 06:01:05PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote: Well, it was just a suggestion, and one that I found easily human readable and editable. :-) Well, that's actually why LDIF was created the way it was. It's easily human AND machine readable and editable. Unlike XML, which they CLAIM is easily human readable but every time I look at it I see red and want to stab people. I've recently started using Apache's ANT build system. Yes, my brain hurts. But I don't have a problem with something looking like LDIF, as long as noone ever expects me to actually feed something into LDAP, or even use LDAP. :-) What do you have against LDAP? :) -brian -- "Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of pop tarts and pancake mix." -- IRC User (http://www.bash.org/?841435)