-----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 13:47 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Cc: Pete Edwards Subject: Re: [HECnet] Returning to HECNET On 2013-01-29 18:35, Pete Edwards wrote: Ok maybe I need to re-phrase the question. My ISP now only offers me a dynamic IP address. My understanding is that Johnny's bridge program is not tolerant of changing IP addresses. Is that still the case? Correct. So based on Sampsa's answer I can connect via a Multinet tunnel and there's at least one Hecnet member (Steve Davidson) who can keep that connected even if the IP address changes? Correct. Would that mean I need to move into another area or request an area to myself? You need to move to Steve's area, or set one up of your own. Johnny Or move to Sampsa's area. -Steve Top-posting on top of a top-posted reply :) On 29 January 2013 00:30, <sampsa at mac.com> wrote: Well Steve Davidson has built a system for updating IP addresses of MULTINET circuits - it seems to work pretty well. sampsa On 29 Jan 2013, at 02:29, Pete Edwards <stimpy.u.idiot at gmail.com> wrote: Hi All, After a rather suddenly enforced break over 2 years ago I'm in a position where I can try and get back onto HECNET. I've renewed my VMS PAKs and have a couple of simh VMS 7.3 instances up again. Unfortunately when I dropped off back then I lost my static IP, so step one, I guess, is asking this: What are the current best options the group has found to deal with dynamic addresses? Alas FLETCH (1.100), my VS4000/60 has suffered some kind of disk trauma during the intervening 2 house moves so it might be a while before I can connect a physical system. Nice to see the return of the mapping project too - rather more elegant than my own short-lived efforts. Cheers, Pete -- Pete Edwards "There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets!" - HMHB