8 Sep
2015
8 Sep
'15
8:53 a.m.
Most people who've worked with xml and xsl/xslt think it's the devils spawn
but yoy can get significant work done with it. It just ain't pretty!
A more DEC centric solution such as vax document would be cool however.
Mark
On 8 Sep 2015 00:57, "Sampsa Laine" <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Yeah, that should be doable.
Doesn't even need to be a database, just an agreed markup structure and
files..
Then just convert them to whatever format you want.
Sampsa
On 8 Sep 2015, at 00:06, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 09/07/2015 05:50 PM, Mark Benson wrote:
This probably sounds ludicrous and over-ambitious
but would it make
sense to compile the information into a database then run various
scripts to compile files of various formats from it?
Just the way my mind works :)
Are you kidding?? This is a phenomenally great idea!
About 12-13 years ago I worked on a project building a commercial
product. I was doing the hardware and firmware, but I was able to steer
the documentation team a bit. We ended up writing all of the
documentation source material in XML, and we had some XSLT scripts to
generate printed manuals, the help files for the application, and the
online documentation on the website. It was all driven from the XML
source documents, so it never got out of sync. It was great.
Sure, I really dislike XML, it's way too friggin' verbose and
overcomplicated for what it is, but it has some pretty significant
advantages: It's well understood, it's standardized, it's documented,
and there are scads of tools out there to manipulate it.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA