11 Oct
2020
11 Oct
'20
10:39 p.m.
That reminds me of something else.? I had been using Johnny's bridge for
a number of months, when all of the sudden, I got some decidedly odd
behavior.
While my router was dutifully forwarding the correct port to the right
machine, by the time the bridge got a hold of the port, the port had
gotten overwritten by ... somebody ...? Bob and I spent some trying to
figure out what was going on; the typical stuff, reboot this, re-power
that, what has changed? (absolutely nothing!!)
I couldn't figure it out and after 'a while' became very annoyed (not
that it takes much).? I modified the bridge to have a different prefix
character ('$') in the bridge stanza.? This causes the bridge to stomp
the correct port in, always.? There is some extra logic to count packets
where the port had to be overwritten and display it, Etc.
So that all worked.? And to look at the counts, sometimes an override is
necessary and then there are the other times.? Lately, it hasn't, viz:
0: purgatorio 0.0.0.0:0 (Rx: 977(1107) Tx: 558 Fw: 419 (Drop rx:
688)) Active: 1 Throttle: 0(015)
1: legato aa.bb.cc.dd:_4711_[Ov: 0, Nov: 560, Lst: 0 (Rx: 558(560)
Tx: 419 Fw: 558 (Drop rx: 2)) Active: 1 Throttle: 0(167)
I doubt anybody else has ever had this, but if you do, then speak up.?
Meanwhile, I'll get my changes back to Johnny.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me - I had ROUT20 on Hecnet for months - first on Linux
then on FreeBSD - worked great with Bob Armstrong at the other end. I
took it off due to reasons I do not remember fully - but was probably
when Bob discovered something when we were trying DDCMP ... maybe Bob
or Paul remembers more?
To be honest, I have never actually looked at PyDECnet! But I should
again acknowledge that you have provided me with invaluable help and
insight.
---
Supratim Sanyal, W1XMT
39.19151 N, 77.23432 W
QCOCAL::SANYAL via HECnet
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 10/10/20 4:50 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> I'll have to look at your work, have not done that in a long time.
>
> My 2 cents worth: we're aiming at different things. I set out to build a full
DECnet implementation in Python, with emphasis on supporting all the parts of the
architecture in a very straightforward way. Efficiency was very much a secondary
consideration. As it happens, the performance is not bad, adequate for a lot of
purposes.
>
> A C based implement such as you did is somewhat harder to write, but much more
efficient. For anyone who is running on a slow machine, or under heavy load, your work is
likely to be the right answer. Also, of course, if you want to run on a machine where
Python is not available or not efficient.
>
> paul
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> On Oct 10, 2020, at 5:11 AM, Rob Jarratt <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> As some of you may be aware, I have been writing my own DECnet router. Since the
last formal release a few years ago I have added a few things, the details are here
https://github.com/rjarratt/Route20. These were all on the Dev branch, which I know a few
people have tried. I have been running the Dev branch for a long time myself, so I am sure
it is stable. All I have done really is make the current Dev branch ?official? by merging
it to the master branch.
>>
>> I know Paul has been much more active than me lately on this front, so I am
probably a bit behind, but if anyone would like to take a look that would be great.
>
>