On 2018-08-12 04:55, Mark Abene wrote:
Honestly mapping the whole network seems a little
redundant, since
Johnny already does that and the information is reasonably up to date on
his web site.
Well, that's not really true. I do not map, or try to keep some kind of
map of HECnet. I have my nodename database, which is entirely voluntary
to register nodes in, and I know that not all nodes on HECnet are in there.
In addition, this does not give much clue about how things are
connected, and for some machines, nothing more than the owner, name and
number is registered.
That said, I do not think it is realistic to automatically try to map
out HECnet anyway, so I think that any such attempts should be thought
about a second time, and probably be abandoned.
There are several problems with trying any kind of mapping. The first is
that there are no proper protocol that is suitable. NICE would be the
obvious first choice, but for example Cisco routers do not provide NICE
at all. And so, you can not traverse and follow connections that way.
There are no other way of just exploring what connections exist, so then
we instead have to resort to an exhaustive search of all node numbers,
using all kind of protocols a machine *might* answer to, which will
trigger all kind of logging events and possibly security systems getting
activated, which is not good.
Some kind of voluntary system is the only acceptable option I think. If
people want to, that could be a way. Possibly using FAL to explore and
find other nodes, but it would have to be based on lists of machines to
probe, which would need to be manually kept up to date.
Similar things have been attempted in the past, with mixed to poor
results, I would say.
Johnny
-Mark
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 7:41 AM, Supratim Sanyal <supratim at
riseup.net
<mailto:supratim at riseup.net>> wrote:
Hi Mark,
I have DCL script generating this web page once a week - perhaps you
see this pinging your system? Or maybe I was looking for a guest
account many months ago for some reason I can?t remember.
http://sanyalnet-openvms-vax.freeddns.org:82/falserver/hecnet-status.html
<http://sanyalnet-openvms-vax.freeddns.org:82/falserver/hecnet-status.html>
Supratim Sanyal
Germantown, MD
On Aug 11, 2018, at 12:15 AM, Mark Abene <phiber at
phiber.com
<mailto:phiber at phiber.com>> wrote:
OK, so who is "SANYAL" at node
1.550? If you'd like an account on
my RSTS/E system, all you need do is ask. I'm one of those sys
admins who actually reads his event logs.? :)
Regards,
Mark
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol