[HECnet] LAT vs CTERM

sampsa at mac.com writes: On 2 Jan 2013, at 14:03, Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote: On 2 Jan 2013, at 11:20, sampsa at mac.com wrote: > >> So LAT is as fast over a WAN link as CTERM is over a LAN..What's wrong with CTERM? > > I could see that on like Z80s running over a 9.6kbps link, but VAX level gear on a 10 Mbps ethernet LAN? It can't be the protocol overhead alone, CTERM must be seriously brain-damaged by design. Just curious. What do the numbers look like when you use RTERM in lieu of CTERM??? -- VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.