Actually it looks like I would need to implement various other layers before
I could even start on NICE, that might be a bit too much. SNMP might be an
option in that case. I don't know much about the details of SNMP, I can look
it up of course but I guess there would need to be a format for the routing
and end node data, if I can match what CISCO produces then that would make
it easier, anyone have any info on this?
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Jarratt [mailto:robert.jarratt at
ntlworld.com]
Sent: 26 December 2012 09:10
To: 'hecnet at Update.UU.SE'
Cc: 'sampsa at mac.com'
Subject: RE: [HECnet] HECnet mapping project
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 26 December 2012 01:24
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Cc: sampsa at
mac.com
Subject: Re: [HECnet] HECnet mapping project
On 2012-12-26 02:13, sampsa at
mac.com wrote:
On 26 Dec 2012, at 03:00, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
Yuck. Seriously, if you depend on manual information, it's going to
be
broken sooner or later.
I'm not at all clear what the problem is, though. I can, from MIM,
tell
which areas are online. And for each area, you can check which nodes
are online in that area. After that, it just becomes a question of
figuring out how the bits are connected.
The problem is the CISCO gear doesnt talk NCP, so we can't do stuff
like
SHOW KNOW CIRC (to get routers to walk) or SHOW ADJ NODES (to get
end
nodes).
If the CISCO guys want on the map, it'll have to be manual for now....
You'll have the same problem with Rob's DECnet router... And possibly
other equipment, or nodes that don't want to talk NICE.
I have just downloaded the spec and will think about how easy it would be
to
add this to the router, not that anyone other than me uses it :-(
Johnny