Op 4 nov. 2018 om 12:25 heeft Johnny Billquist
<bqt at softjar.se> het volgende geschreven:
Also worth pointing out that having multiple Multinet connections don't hurt. It adds
redundancy, which means resilience. Just set costs that favor the link you think is the
"best" (and further discussions on link costs will be ignored by me, as we have
never been able to agree on what costs should reflect, and how, in HECnet :-) ).
Johnny
On 2018-11-04 12:20, supratim sanyal wrote:
Sorry port 60000 is taken, please use port *60004* if you do run a test.
Thanks.
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
*From: *supratim sanyal <mailto:supratim at riseup.net>
*Sent: *Sunday, November 4, 2018 06:19
*To: *hecnet at Update.UU.SE <mailto:hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
*Subject: *RE: [HECnet] Multinet connection in UK
If you wish you can run an experiment with IMPVAX (VA, USA); I have heard trans-Atlantic
loop latencies are not as bad as one might think. TCP only, Something like this in
DECNET-CIRCUITS.COM should work:
$ multinet set /decnet /remote=52.23.221.223 /port=60000 /device=tcpa0: /connect
/tcp=connect /buffers=24
Supratim
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
*From: *Douglas Hall <mailto:dhall.hecnet at dhcl.co.uk>
*Sent: *Sunday, November 4, 2018 03:26
*To: *hecnet at Update.UU.SE <mailto:hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
*Subject: *[HECnet] Multinet connection in UK
Is there anyone in the UK/Europe that would be able to provide me with a connection to
HECNet via a multinet link?
I'm connected off AS8676 - the node IP is 217.65.167.14. It's not currently
reachable via ICMP but if you ping 217.65.160.9 you should get a reasonable idea of
latency.
cheers,
Douglas
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol