25 Jan
2016
25 Jan
'16
6:33 p.m.
On 2016-01-25 18:17, Robert Armstrong wrote:
Symmetrical routing will be impossible. DECnet is not designed in a way
that makes it possible.
I can accept a, but I'm not convinced it makes life better, but more to
the point - if you want starting to tweak things based on different,
unrelated things, this will not work, and we might as well give up right
away.
I'm starting to feel that I'm just going to drop this. Do whatever you
want. I'll put all my circuits at the same cost.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I will
participate.
Oh, and sure - I'll go along provided I can get the routing results that I want.
Sorry to be selfish, but I'm not going to put up with some nonsensical routing path
just so that we can have standardized costs.
I already put forth my requirements for the routing a while ago - there are only two.
a) If two nodes have a direct point to point link, then that link should be the
preferred route.
b) I really want symmetrical routing.
I already know that there are those who believe that symmetrical routing is impossible to
achieve, so maybe I'll give up on (b). I still want (a) though.