[HECnet] Network topology according to MIM.

But that is NOT an example of a bad topology. It is what a highly fault tolerant topology would look like. You can certainly build star topologies, as you suggest, but you can also design topologies that tolerate any single failure. Or even any double failure. Single fault tolerant topologies would have two area exit routers, and redundant paths within the area. That second aspect is critical because of the DECnet Phase IV rule that in-area traffic never takes any out-of-area paths, even if the area is partitioned. In a fault tolerant network, even if the circuit costs are symmetrical, the paths may not be. In DECnet, because of the tie breaking rule, they will at least be predictable. IP does things differently: it might use multiple paths if they have equal costs, and it may choose among them in ways that are not specified (I'm not sure of the details of the latter case). In DECnet Phase V, there does exist equal cost path splitting. I think it was also added in Phase IV-plus, but I don't have any documents for that version. It isn't in plain Phase IV, though the NSP spec does describe hanging on to out of order packets (which is what you want to do if your network performs equal cost path splitting). paul