[HECnet] Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

On 01/09/2013 10:40 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: In that case, the next question is obviously how the DECnet routing table at 61.1 looks like. Area Cost Hops Next Hop to Node Expires Prio *1 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *2 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *3 14 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *4 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *5 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *6 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *7 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *8 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *9 10 1 Tunnel6 -> 9.1023 38 64 A+ *11 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *12 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *18 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *19 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *20 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *28 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *33 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *42 10 1 Tunnel4 -> 42.1023 35 64 A+ *44 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *47 13 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *51 13 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *52 10 1 Tunnel1 -> 52.1 37 64 A+ *59 10 1 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 41 64 A+ Actually, why don't you have an entry for area 61 in your routing table? That's a damn good question. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA