Actually the fun mil-spec VT100 was the Tempest VT100.? Metal case to
avoid radiating information into the air and a metal cased VT100 keyboard.
Dropped that in my lap only ONCE at the FBI facility I was Field Service
for. Ugh.
bill
On 4/23/20 7:21 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Oh how quickly people forget. :-)
The correct quote is:
If your computer don't have 36 bits, you are not playing with a full DEC.
The "mil-spec" VT100 was probably the RT100:
https://vt100.net/docs/tp83/chapter8.html (oh how I hate the
"everything should be using https"...)
? Johnny
On 2020-04-24 00:15, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
Sir, I stand *corrected* and do humbly admit my
errors.? I didn't see
anything Orange on the mac.io website, so I just assumed...? I didn't
go to the Facebook site because I won't have a thing to do with their
policies, stated or covert.
A memory surfaced and I realized that I was also completely wrong
about the 2020's networking capabilities, too.? In 1979, DEC's
Federal Systems group had a 2020 on the ARPAnet and I used it to send
email to some of my pals at MIT LCS when I working 2nd and 3rd
shift.? So the hardware existed to communicate with an IMP and MIT
used it implement TCP/IP on ITS.? This is simulated by the KLH10 2020
implementation and that's how ITS communicates today.
Federal Systems was a real hike from manufacturing in Marlboro where
I used to hang out; three buildings away.? It was also notable for
having mil-spec VT100's.? Instead of plastic, they were made out of
very thick metal, I think maybe machined aluminum.? The cables where
sheathed in metal and the connectors were substantially enlarged and
strengthened.? The display glass also had a dense metal screen in
front of it.? They really looked like they could withstand a hand
grenade and weighed a ton... Well that's what I thought at the time,
another alternative that didn't occur to me until decades later was
that all this just could have been RF shielding.
I had left DEC and was at Columbia before the Internet role out, so I
don't know whether Tops-20 4.1, the last official release for the
2020, supported TCP/IP.? I just can't remember, darn it...? I know
that Tops-20 5.0 supported TCP/IP AND that MRC was able to port 5.0
to the 2020.? LingLing was on the Internet from time to time.? That
must have been some hack; by late version 3, it was seen that the
monitor was running out of address space and when the hardware folks
suggested eliminating the symbol table, the monitor folks flipped as
debugging would have been effectively hatcheted.
The solution for 4.1 was one of the finest hacks I have ever heard
of; while the 2020 doesn't support extended addressing, it does
support multiple address spaces, so what they did was move all the
symbols into a separate address space.? This was called 'hiding'
symbols and I thought it was great because it made them harder to
smash.? However, all of that went out the window with 5.0, which
fully supported extended addressing.
DEC completely walked away from the 2020 and symbol hiding for the
Tops-20 5.0 monitor.? In fact, I remember an SPR response scolding an
acquaintance of mine for trying to turn symbol hiding back on in
5.0.? Basically, it was a corporate, 'Fuggetaboutit'.? Pity; for user
programs, Tenex and Tops-20 had something called IDDT (Invisible DDT)
which kept the symbols in a completely different process space,
effectively making them impossible to smash, no matter how sick your
program got. Symbol hiding was cool.? Not that I'm going to try
figure out how to turn it back on...
You know, I have been out to Pittsburgh a few times.? In the 1980's,
Columbia flew me out there so that I could learn about CMU's
modifications to LPTSPL to support the nearly entirely awesome Xerox
9700.? I was out there again about a year ago for a conference.?
Still, that's a real hike...? My relatives live in near
Elizabethtown, not quite spitting distance from three mile island
(!!), so that's another four hours to New Kensington after they're
done with me.? Ouch...? Oh well, never say 'never'...
That's some pretty good swag you have by the way; minor suggestion,
in addition to the anti-VAXer T-shirt, you might want to have another
one that says the somewhat subtle, "If it doesn't have 36 Bits, it
isn't a Digital computer".? I did know some people who were so
anti-VAX that they positively would froth at the mouth.? I could
understand the frothing, given what happened, but still, one prefers
not wear one's froth on their sleeve.? It would have been a lot
better for everybody had there been more and better communication and
less NIH.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On 4/23/20 12:20 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> On 4/22/20 11:42 PM, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I'm in Looooong Island, South Shore.
> ?? Ahhh, New Yawwwk.? You should head out this way at some point.
>
>> I actually have relatives not far from you in PA, but I hadn't gotten
>> around to noodging you yet for the distinct lack of 20's in your
>> collection.? I mean, you have a 4341 yet no 20?? Tisk, tisk...
> ?? You sir are misinformed.? There are three KS10s here.
>
>> Well, I'm pulling your leg a bit; a 20 is a seriously heavy lift.?
>> A KL
>> has three purposes in life: 1) Generate Heat, 2) Suck Power, 3) Run
>> winning code.? A 2020 uses far less power, but doesn't have extended
>> addressing, so it is stuck at Tops-20 4.1, which leaves out a lot of
>> DECnet (and ARPAnet) stuff.? Apparently, you can squeeze 5.0 in;
>> MRC did
>> this, but that was MRC.? Tops-20 is at version 7.0 now.
> ?? Indeed.
>
>> And both of them are seriously cranky beasts that needed care and
>> feeding from trained service personnel; wire wrap and all that (yech).
>> Remember, it's not a mainframe unless you can't fit it in your
>> house and
>> have to take out a second mortgage to pay for the electricity and tons
>> (60 for a 20) of air conditioning.
> ?? We're no strangers to cranky around here. ;)
>
>> So Paul Allen had a KL based 20, which is now in the the Living
>> Computer
>> museum.? But that cost was apparently less than a rounding error
>> compared to what he was worth.? A mere monetary blip, as it were.
> ?? Yep.
>
> ?????????? -Dave
>
--
Digital had it then. Don't you wish you could buy it now!