On 2016-01-20 19:38, Steve Davidson wrote:
SG1 to MIM is a consistent 130ms.
Thanks. So my idea on 1-2 for some Europe-links, 3 to the east coast,
and 5 to the west seems to also map rather well with the ping times...
And to make it clear, my links so far as the ethernet, which I mentioned
before, I have a rather high level two routing cost on, and one link
each to Bob, Steve and Rok.
Or, to show it as my tool does:
.mnc list
Circuit State Cost Proto Port Remote destination
IP-0-0 On 5/5 UDP 700 108-65-195-50.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcg:700
IP-0-1 On 3/3 UDP 700 eagle.hecnet.org:700
IP-0-2 On 2/2 UDP 700 193.2.191.212:700
IP-0-3 Off 1/1 Unknown 700 Default:0
IP-0-4 Off 1/1 Unknown 700 Default:0
IP-0-5 Off 1/1 Unknown 700 Default:0
IP-0-6 Off 1/1 Unknown 700 Default:0
IP-0-7 Off 1/1 Unknown 700 Default:0
.
But, this is as the world looks at from MIM. Others need to figure out
what makes sense for them, but this can at least give some suggestions
on costs.
Johnny
-Steve
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 10:30, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-01-20 18:27, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>> On 2016-01-20 18:24, Robert Armstrong wrote:
>>>> However,
decnet.jfcl.com do not respond to pings... :-(
>>>
>>> Sorry, configuration error. Try again.
>>
>> Great. A very steady 200ms from MIM (resulution is only 20ms on the
>> machine).
>>
>> Now, if we can have a couple of others, to form some idea of a good
>> basis for costs...
>
> One more datapoint: Me in switzerland to MIM is about 60ms.
>
> Johnny
>
> --
> Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
> || on a psychedelic trip
> email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
> pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol