When I boot my 3-machine SimH VAXcluster, my MOP booted VAX system I
am seeing this:
%VAXcluster, system loaded from node DARMOK (AA-00-04-00-33-18)
%SYSBOOT-I-SYSBOOT Mapping the SYSDUMP.DMP on the System Disk
%SYSBOOT-I-SYSBOOT SYSDUMP.DMP on System Disk successfully mapped
%SYSBOOT-I-SYSBOOT Mapping PAGEFILE.SYS on the System Disk
%SYSBOOT-I-SYSBOOT SAVEDUMP parameter not set to protect the PAGEFILE.SYS
OpenVMS (TM) VAX Version V7.3 Major version id = 1 Minor version id = 0
%WBM-I-WBMINFO Write Bitmap has successfully completed initialization.
%SYSINIT, waiting to form or join a VMScluster system
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system PIVAX2
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Port has Closed Virtual Circuit - REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%CNXMAN, lost connection to system DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system PIVAX2
%CNXMAN, now a VAXcluster member -- system PIVAX3
%CNXMAN, re-established connection to system DARMOK
Is this;
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
normal? It seems to happen at boot in the same place in the sequence.
I wonder if it's the OS bootstrap reconfiguring the XQA0: interface?
I don't know, though, just looked odd.
--
Mark