Hum... Let me noodle over that for a bit.
I think it's a completely reasonable position to assume that I've a
mistake, wrong assumption or am using something in such a way that it
does not want to be used... After all, the code is brand new; just
written, Etc.
I'll have to put some more instrumentation in, Etc, Etc.
I don't imagine there is anything clever about
MIM::DU1:[DECNET]TEST.DIS;1? Don't see why there would be...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 11/29/22 7:09 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
What I can tell is what I can see in the sources. And there I have this:
HF.STR=001 ; Stream ID bit in DAP header menu
HF.LEN=002 ; Length bit in DAP header menu
HF.XLN=004 ; Extended length bit in DAP header menu
HF.BIT=010 ; BITCNT bit in DAP header menu
HF.SYS=040 ; System specific field bit in DAP
header menu
HF.SEG=100 ; Segmented msg bit in DAP header menu
HT.BIT is the thing you are seeing which is not there in the DAP 5.6
spec. I don't really know what it is about, but it's something the RSX
DAP have defined anyway.
I can't find any use of it. Looking in the code, I don't even see that
it would ever be set. So I wonder if you made some mistake in your
decoding?
Johnny
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On 2022-11-29 18:41, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
>
> I fixed the bit definition for Not Last Message of Segmented Message
> from bit 4 to 6 as per DAP V5.6 and properly defined bit 4 as the
> Reserved field. In other words, I am following Tops-10, which I
> believe to have the correct definitions. Then I finished the flag
> breakout logic and tested again some systems. The MIM:: result is of
> note, viz.:
>
> [Parsing Name message] [Parsing Attributes message] [Allocated
> Receive buffer (Words=531. Len=2086.)] [Trimmed 381. words from
> receive buffer] [Received Date/time Attributes message
> (Flg=*RESV*,SYSPEC UFlg=1000 Cnt=560.)] [Parsing Date/time Attributes
> message] [Parsing File Protection Attributes message] [Parsing Name
> message] TEST.DIS;1;P775656 2 2560(8) 18-Nov-2013 01:18:27
> So what's up with *RESV*? Is (reserved) bit 4 being used for
> something new (I.E., post DAP 5.6) now? If so, what? The UFlg is an
> octal field for bits that I don't know about. In this case, MIM:: is
> sending bit 9 high, which the PDP-10 (which is the opposite endian)
> sees as bit 26. What's that?
>
> Just wondering if I'm seeing what I'm seeing here...
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> On 11/27/22 12:34 AM, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
>>
>> Whoops, I mistyped the PDP-10 bit definition for bit six; it's
>> 1B*29* and not 1B/28/. Sigh...
>>
>> DAP
>> Bit Bit Meaning PDP-10
>> Bit Tops-20
>> DAP Symbol
>> 0 Stream Identification Field Present 1B35 HD$SID
>> 1 Length Field Present 1B34 HD$LEN
>> 2 Extended Length Field Present 1B33 HD$LN2
>> 3 Bit Count Field Present 1B32 HD$BCT
>> 4 Reserved 1B31 HD$SEG
>> 5 System Specific Field Present 1B30
>> 6 Not last message of segmented message 1B29
>>
>> I looked the Tops-10 DAP flags definitions (in SWIL.MAC); it looks
>> like Tops-10 has it right and Tops-20 has it wrong, viz:
>>
>> DAP
>> Bit Bit Meaning PDP-10
>> Bit Tops-20
>> DAP Symbol
>> 0 Stream ID field present 1B35 DF$SID
>> 1 LENGTH field present 1B34 DF$HLN
>> 2 LEN256 field present 1B33 DF$HL2
>> 3 BITCNT field present 1B32 DF$BCT
>> *4* *Reserved* *1B31* *DF$XX1*
>> 5 SYSPEC field present 1B30 DF$SHX
>> *6* *More data coming* *1B29* *DF$MOR*
>>
>> Johnny, can you send me the RSX DAP flag definitions when you get a
>> minute?
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> On 11/26/22 11:58 PM, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
>>>
>>> I was writing a routine to break out DAP flag bits to aid debugging
>>> when I noticed a possible discrepancy between DAP V5.6 and Tops-20,
>>> viz:
>>>
>>> DAP
>>> Bit Bit Meaning PDP-10
>>> Bit Tops-20
>>> DAP Symbol
>>> 0 Stream Identification Field Present 1B35 HD$SID
>>> 1 Length Field Present 1B34 HD$LEN
>>> 2 Extended Length Field Present 1B33 HD$LN2
>>> 3 Bit Count Field Present 1B32 HD$BCT
>>> 4 Reserved 1B31 HD$SEG
>>> 5 System Specific Field Present 1B30
>>> 6 Not last message of segmented message 1B28
>>>
>>> DAP V5.6 reserves bit 4 and defines bit 6 to flag that a segmented
>>> message is being sent and that this is not the last message. In
>>> other words, that there will be another message. Tops-20 is using
>>> bit 4 for this purpose and by rights it would appear that it should
>>> be using bit 6.
>>>
>>> I will go see if I can't scare up what Tops-10 is doing, but I was
>>> wondering if anyone knew what other OS's are doing.