[HECnet] Cisco tunnels: update my IP

175/10 cable with a constant ache to upgrade to gigabit from one of the providers. ;) ----- Original Message ----- > What sort of connection do you have? > > -brian > >> On Jun 23, 2016, at 10:55, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: >> >> ...it also exceeds the capabilities of a 2851. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 07:26, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: >>> >>> My connection exceeds the capabilities of the 2620 or I would. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 05:30, Peter Lothberg <roll at Stupi.SE> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Why don't you put your 2600 as your boarder-gw? >>>> >>>> interface Tunnel1 >>>> ip address 192.108.195.70 255.255.255.252 >>>> ip router isis >>>> ipv6 address 2001:440:1880:ABCD::2/64 >>>> ipv6 enable >>>> ipv6 mtu 1420 >>>> ipv6 router isis >>>> decnet cost 1 >>>> isis metric 2 >>>> tunnel source ATM0/1/0.1 >>>> tunnel destination 192.36.147.120 >>>> ! >>>> interface ATM0/1/0 >>>> mtu 4470 >>>> no ip address >>>> ip virtual-reassembly in max-fragments 64 max-reassemblies 512 >>>> load-interval 30 >>>> atm restart timer 90 >>>> no atm ilmi-keepalive >>>> dsl enable-training-log delay 0 >>>> dsl power-cutback 6 >>>> dsl noise-margin -2 >>>> dsl gain-setting rx-offset 3 >>>> dsl bitswap both >>>> ! >>>> interface ATM0/1/0.1 point-to-point >>>> mtu 4470 >>>> ip dhcp client broadcast-flag set >>>> ip address dhcp >>>> ip nat outside >>>> ip virtual-reassembly in >>>> atm route-bridged ip >>>> pvc 0/35 >>>> protocol bridge >>>> encapsulation aal5snap >>>> >>>> -P >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> On 23/06/2016 1:47 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: >>>>>> Found the actual problem! >>>>>> >>>>>> IPSec VTI VPNs means I can't do source-based NAT/firewall rules to redirect GRE >>>>>> from the DECnet tunnel IPs to a separate box as is currently configured. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So, does this mean that you're still off the air? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Tim. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> ` >>>