[HECnet] Swedish Pascal under RSX-11M-Plus?

On a tangent, who made Swedish Pascal? /P On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:49:22AM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote: >Aaaand... One more comment. > >I don't know exactly which version of Swedish Pascal I have. I remember >going through all DECUS tapes at the time, trying to find the most recent >version, but you might have a newer version than me. >I fixed the patching though, so you can just apply that knowledge to your >version. > >The correct patch for RSX-11M-PLUS V4.6 is: >GBLPAT=ROOT:$AUTO+34:431 ; BR SEGENT rsx v4.1 > > Johnny > >On 2017-10-31 08:33, Johnny Billquist wrote: >>By the way... I played around with Swedish Pascal a few years ago, for >>some needs I had for Pascal. I hit some snags with Oregon Pascal, and then >>tried Swedish, and realized the code generated is rather ugly, and it was >>going to be a gigantic effort if you ever want it to be able to run with >>split I/D space, so I gave up on it. >> >>There is also the DEC PDP-11 Pascal, which I never tried getting to run, >>as it appeared it wasn't any better than Oregon. >> >> ? Johnny >> >>On 2017-10-31 08:27, Johnny Billquist wrote: >>>Um.. Yes. That rings a bell. >>>I fixed that a few years ago. You should find a correct version at >>>MIM::DU:[SWEPAS] >>> >>> ?? Johnny >>> >>>On 2017-10-31 02:29, Dave McGuire wrote: >>>> >>>> ?? Hey folks.? I'm trying to get "Swedish" Pascal v6.3 running under >>>>RSX-11M-Plus v4.6, and have hit a problem.? The created PAS.TSK crashes >>>>on invocation, and I suspect it may be due to a patch that gets applied >>>>to a library during the build process.? This appears in PAS.BLD: >>>> >>>> ???????? ; >>>> ???????? ; The above GBLPAT statement patches a branch instruction >>>> ???????? ; into the system overlay autoload routine AUTO. >>>> ???????? ; The last few releases of most operating systems have had >>>> ???????? ; different versions of AUTO.? The proper GBLPAT statement >>>> ???????? ; to use above depends on which AUTO routine you have on >>>> ???????? ; your system.? You can identify which one you have by >>>> ???????? ; examining the object module ident of module AUTO in >>>> ???????? ; the system object library, SYSLIB.? Use a command such as >>>> ???????? ; "LBR LB:[1,1]SYSLIB/FU" to do this.? The GBLPAT statements >>>> ???????? ; to use with each AUTO routine are: >>>> ???????? ; >>>> ???????? ;??? AUTO ident???????? GBLPAT statement >>>> ???????? ;?? ============?????? ================== >>>> ???????? ;??? ??early?????????? GBLPAT=ROOT:$AUTO+34:437 >>>> ???????? ;????? 08????????????? GBLPAT=ROOT:$AUTO+34:435 >>>> ???????? ;????? 09.08?????????? GBLPAT=ROOT:$AUTO+36:441 >>>> ???????? ;????? 10.02?????????? GBLPAT=ROOT:$AUTO+36:431 >>>> ???????? ; >>>> >>>> ?? The ident of AUTO in my system is 10.05, making that patch >>>>potentially >>>>land at the wrong address.? However, that's just my suspicion.? Has >>>>anyone gotten Swedish Pascal v6.3 running under RSX-11M-Plus v4.6? >>>> >>>> ???????????? -Dave >>>> >>> >> > >-- >Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus > || on a psychedelic trip >email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books >pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol