There are now CRLFs on outbound lines, one record per line, one message per line.
By interoperate, I meant that @host might signal a tcp/ip finger call to host whereas
host:: would be decnet.
K
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnny Billquist [mailto:bqt@softjar.se]
Sent: 23 January 2026 16:14
To: hecnet(a)lists.dfupdate.se
Subject: [HECnet] Re: DECnet Finger Specification (Possible re-post) and Tops-20 Finger
Setup Documentation (New)
On 23/01/2026 17.07, Keith Halewood wrote:
Is DECnet finger supposed to interoperate with tcp/ip
finger at some
point, hence the CRLF (though shouldn’t
that just be LF?
The TCP/IP finger spec says that each line should end with CR+LF.
As for "interoperate", I'm not sure how you mean that. But I can tell that
my RSX implementation talks over both DECnet, TCP/IP and locally.
But generally, I'm trying to advocate for as much alignment between the DECnet and
TCP/IP finger as possible. Obviously the network underlying functions are not identical,
but beyond that I prefer that we align as much as is reasonable. So CR+LF at each line
end. In DECnet, be aware of the size of packets sent. At the moment, I suggest each packet
sent is just one line, but if we can work out, and agree on some other value, I'm
happy to comply. But it can't be huge, as a PDP-11 do not have unlimited memory. :-)
Johnny
_______________________________________________
HECnet mailing list -- hecnet(a)lists.dfupdate.se To unsubscribe send an email to
hecnet-leave(a)lists.dfupdate.se