8 Nov
2021
8 Nov
'21
10 p.m.
It's apparently 5.10.77-v7+.
It eventually goes a bit wrong responding to NICE requests with VMS complaining
'invalid management response' but the output showing a '...such file or
directory' but I'll try some troubleshooting tomorrow.
I installed 'latd' (apt install latd), started up with latcp -s and it's
picked up all the LAT services on the LAN, including itself, the RX4640, the KLH10
instance of Panda TOPS-20... looks fine too. Identifies its connections as the hostname
and tty, such as "PI3B3//dev/ttyAMA0"
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of John
Forecast
Sent: 08 November 2021 19:26
To: hecnet at update.uu.se
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Is this the most up to date version of DECnet OS numbers?
Glad it?s working for you. Is this running the latest Raspbian release? What kernel
version is it running?
John.
On Nov 8, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Keith Halewood
<Keith.Halewood at pitbulluk.org> wrote:
Well, that was an interesting compilation of the raspbian kernel.
I cloned https://github.com/JohnForecast/RaspbianDECnet and got busy. I had to remove the
--help-- stanzas from the Kconfig file. They were tripping something up.
I had to move the MAC address change to the bridge (I use
/etc/network/interfaces with bridges and taps etc..)
DECnet is all working on a 32bit raspbian on a pi3b+, HECnet node name
29.115 - I'll christen it at some point :) Thank you John Forecast for doing all the
hard work.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 07 November 2021 20:37
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Is this the most up to date version of DECnet OS numbers?
On 2021-11-07 18:06, Robert Armstrong wrote:
Right. It was/is slightly more than a toolkit. It does have a couple of processes which
deals with circuits and executor management. And I think there is TLK/LSN so you can
communicate. But beyond that, you were on your own.
And no, OS/8 under RTS-8 don't allow them to be counted as one. :-)
I think
DECnet/8 is for RTS-8, but there never was one for OS-8.
Yes, the DECnet-8 was for RTS although you could run OS/8 as a task
under RTS (so maybe those two count as the same). In any case AFAIK
there was never any NFT or FAL or remote terminal or NCP/NML or
anything else like that implemented for DECnet/8. It was more of a
toolkit kind of thing where you could write your own RTS program to
make a DECnet connection to another node. What you sent over that connection was your
problem. Never heard of DECnet for CP/M although there
certainly was one for MSDOS.
Linux is interesting, although I doubt that was put there by DEC.
Probably somebody added it later.
Linux was definitely defined post-DEC. I simply just talked with a Linux FAL from RSX and
checked what value it put in the OS field, and added that to my list from there.
And what the heck is COPOS/11?? I see that is
says TOPS-20 front
end, but I thought TOPS20 used the same RSX20F as TOPS10.
I don't think it's the same as the RSX20F frontend. I have no idea what it is,
but it's in the source files for the RSX DECnet code. Sounds like some oddball thing
that existed somewhere. CSS thing maybe?
And DTF/MVS? Is that the IBM OS MVS?
I almost suspect it might be, but again, no real clue. All I can say is that this is what
is in the RSX sources.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol