Well, the CLEAR/PURGE is only for the name, not any
other information...
? Johnny
On 2021-05-31 23:04, Steve Davidson wrote:
Unfortunately CLEAR/PURGE is not a good idea in
clusters or nodes
that boot DECservers.? VMS requires additional information in the
database for those nodes/servers that would be wiped out. That is why
I wrote
NETUPDATEV2.COM. It does the update without touching any
nodes in the local area.
-Steve Davidson
SF:iP1
> On May 31, 2021, at 16:49, Keith Halewood
> <Keith.Halewood at pitbulluk.org> wrote:
>
> ?With VMS, it's also permissible to copy
> sys$system:netnode_remote.dat to other nodes, mainly because no
> executor information is contained within this file.
>
Dune::netupdatev3.com is a modified form of the update script which
> does a purge/clear by individual area, except for one's own area
> which is handled on a node by node basis, including a configurable
> range within that area which is ignored. For example, it prevents
> MIM:: from overriding 29.100-199 by default.
>
> Keith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
> On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
> Sent: 31 May 2021 20:48
> To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Subject: Re: [HECnet] SETNOD, Part 2
>
> If there is some additional commands you'd like for me to put into
> FIX.T20, let me know.
>
> The VMS commandfile I creates starts like this:
>
> $ MCR NCP
> PURGE NODE * NAME
> CLEAR NODE * NAME
> def nod 41.28 name 28NH
> .
> .
> .
>
> Which means that any previous definitions are first cleared out
> before any definitions go in.
> This is because VMS (and RSX) do not handle if you have a node name
> that gets a different address. Clearing things out first solves that.
>
> The alternate thing that can be done in VMS is that you can copy
> nodenames from within NCP from another node, which seems to avoid
> the problem as well (I think).
>
> In RSX, the permanent nodename database in RSX can be created by a
> separate tool that does not at all relates to the current nodename
> database, so in RSX it's rather easy. You download a new database,
> and then you switch it over to the new db.
>
> With other systems I don't know at all.
>
> ?? Johnny
>
>
>> On 2021-05-31 20:50, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
>> I was wondering if anybody would care to explain how routine node
>> maintenance happens for DECnet on non-Tops-20 systems. Specifically,
>> Johnny's node list on MIM:: changes more or less about once a month,
>> sometimes more, sometimes less.
>>
>> Is anybody keeping up on this?? How?? I had a (bi-weekly) re-occurring
>> batch job which NFT'ed the latest node file from MIM:: and simply used
>> SETNOD to shove the whole thing into the running monitor, on the
>> assumption that the monitor would figure out what to do. While
>> slapping in the whole list (with .NDINT) during timesharing did strike
>> me as somewhat wasteful, I didn't pay much attention to the matter
>> as it did work.
>>
>> This is mistaken.? Tops-20 will not 'make it' work, nor does it
>> apparently detect certain situations which appear to be problematic.
>> It does detect and reject two situations.
>>
>> 1. You may not change either the name or address of the host (I.E.,
>> the
>> ??? Executor).? These can only be set once at boot up. Do other
>> ??? operating systems have this restriction?
>> 2. You may not change the address of an existing node in the local
>> area.
>>
>> A node insertion in the local area which usurps an address of another
>> node deletes that node.? Outside of the local area, you are on your
>> own.? It does whatever you want, which means that you can have
>> multiple nodes with the same address.? Is that a problem? On IP4,
>> this would been known as 'aliasing', but I don't think DECnet
>> allows this.
>>
>> So it would appear that the appropriate behavior is that a new node
>> list implies a system reboot.? Unless I'm actively doing monitor
>> development, I can't stand doing this.
>>
>> However, fixing the problem turned out to be pernicious. Neither of
>> the two cases above is reported to the user program; there is no way
>> to determine what might have gone wrong.? There is no way for the user
>> program to proactively prevent errors because, while you can ask
>> Tops-20 to translate a DECnet address to a node name and to verify
>> that a DECnet node name exists, there is no way to return the address
>> for a verified DECnet node name.? Is this an oversight?? Can a user
>> program get the address of a DECnet node name on other operating
>> systems?
>>
>> I remediated the low level error reporting issue and implemented a new
>> function for NODE% to return the address of an existing DECnet node
>> (.NDVFX or Verify Node Extended).? Fixing SETNOD proved impossible.? I
>> discovered that the actions to be performed were complex enough when
>> automated that the dimensions of the solution were wholly beyond its
>> capabilities.? Not that there was anything wrong with SETNOD, it just
>> wasn't designed for this kind of heavy lift.? So I rewrote it from
>> scratch (cleverly naming it SETND2). I'm converging on completion, but
>> I don't work on it actively, so this will probably be a few more
>> weeks.
>>
>> Here is some sample output; let's suppose that BOINGO needs its
>> address changed from 2.399 to 2.400 and that this conflicts with
>> another node (in this case, APOLLO). To get this to work right, what
>> you need to do is tell Tops-20 to do is delete BOINGO first, so that
>> there is no name clash on the insertion.? Then you have to delete
>> APOLLO, so that there is no address conflict.? Once you are done
>> performing both these actions, it's safe to do the insertion and
>> Tops-20 doesn't reject it or otherwise get itself confused.
>>
>> @*setnd2*
>> % Insufficient capabilities for INSERT command
>>
>> SETNODE>*vERBOSITY* (level is) *vERBOSE *
>> Verbosity level is VERBOSE
>> SETNODE>*get /sECTION-MAP /nO-ACCESS*
>> [BIN file: TOMMYT:<SYSTEM>NODE-DATA.BIN.91;RESTRICTED-JFN:13 ] Mapped
>> one section (4 pages), 1778 Words, 889 Nodes.
>> SETNODE>*recONSTRUCT /sILENT *
>> [Closed log file: NUL:]
>> SETNODE>*shoW aREA 2 uNCHANGED*
>> [Area 2]
>> A2RTR?? ADAGIO? ADVENT? ADVNT5? AMAPUR? APOLLO? AUG11 AUGVAX? BASSET
>> BEAGLE? BELLS?? BOINGO? BOXER?? BULDOG? CHARON CODA COLLIE? CONDOR
>> CORGI?? COYOTE? CYPHER? DALMTN DIVISI? DOGPAK ELIDYR ELITE?? FOX
>> GLDRTR? GLOVER? GRUNT HERMES? HUIA??? HUNTER? HUSKY JACKAL? JENSEN
>> KELPIE LABRDR? LAPDOG LARGO?? LEGATO? LENTO?? MASTIF MENTOR? MEZZO
>> MULTIA? MUTT??? NO0K??? ODST??? OINGO?? OSIRIS? PAVANE POCO??? POODLE
>> PUG???? PUGGLE? PUPPY?? R2X899? REACH?? SPARK TERIER THEARK? TOMMYT
>> VENTI?? WLFHND? WOLF??? ZITI Total nodes in area 2: 67
>> SETNODE>*shoW **uNCHANGED boiNGO*
>> BOINGO:: (2.399)
>> SETNODE>*set 2.400 boingo*
>> Set existing node BOINGO:: (2.400)
>> Node BOINGO:: (2.400)
>> % Removing node BOINGO:: (2.399) from same list to insert in the
>> delete list % Re-using key text for insertion in delete list, BOINGO
>> (2.399) % Removing BOINGO::'s previous address (2.399) % Removing node
>> APOLLO:: (2.400) from same list to insert in the delete list %
>> Re-using key text for insertion in delete list, APOLLO (2.400) %
>> Deleting APOLLO:: (2.400) to reassign its address to BOINGO::
>> % Allowing update request for node BOINGO:: (2.400) because being
>> deleted as (2.399) % Removing node BOINGO:: (2.399) from unchanged
>> list because its address has changed to (2.400) % Re-using key text
>> for insertion in update list, BOINGO (2.400) Node change request for
>> BOINGO:: (2.400)
>> SETNODE>
>>
>
> --
> Johnny Billquist????????????????? || "I'm on a bus
> ?????????????????????????????????? ||? on a psychedelic trip
> email: bqt at softjar.se???????????? ||? Reading murder books
> pdp is alive!???????????????????? ||? tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol