On Mar
13, 2023, at 11:55 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt(a)softjar.se> wrote:
On 2023-03-13 16:06, Paul Koning wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2023, at 10:55 AM, Johnny
Billquist <bqt(a)softjar.se> wrote:
>
> ...
> The problem with Phase IV Prime is that it will not be compatible with any other
Phase IV node, so it would be of very limited value.
>
>> I'm planning to implement that at some point in PyDECnet to allow it to talk
to DECnet nodes on WiFi, where changing the address doesn't normally work. But if
there is any other hardware with that limitation it would work there as well. The changes
are pretty modest, especially for end nodes.
>
> True. But you will only be able to talk to other Phase IV prime nodes. And I
don't think I've ever seen any, so that would boil down to just be able to talk
DECnet to other PyDECnet nodes. Not sure how much value that would have...
Phase IV Prime can only talk to prime neighbors, but via a prime router it can talk to
anything else just like regular Phase IV. So it should be useful; the only limitation is
that you'd need to have a Phase IV prime router adjacency.
Right. And since the only Prime implementation that I am aware of would be the PyDECnet
one, it means you can talk DECnet directly between those, but not to anything else.
However, you can also achieve this by just having GRE, Multinet, or whatever in between
those two nodes, and just use IP.
Yes, IP would work for nodes having Multinet
support. Can a Toad do that?