Well, I think we should leave the format alone and just add LAT= and LONG= to the location
field.
It's not hard to parse :)
Sampsa
On 26 Dec 2012, at 00:50, Rob Jarratt <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
I think LAT/LONG is unambiguous and also gives you the opportunity to be
more precise if you want to. We can keep "location" as a more informal
description though.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: 25 December 2012 22:25
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] HECnet mapping project
I'd just add a LAT/LONG field before the notes one
FWIW, the existing INFO.TXT format already has a "location" field - it's
City
and Country, but you can just geolocate the city center.
Bob