3 Jul
2016
3 Jul
'16
10:04 p.m.
On 07/03/2016 03:53 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016, Dave McGuire wrote:
How bizarre. ;) The actual vlan *names* (VTP-wise) here are sensible
at least. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 07/03/2016 03:22 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It is. I get the feeling you find that more interesting than I do. ;)
VLAN names and tags and subnets don't necessarily match in the legacy
network at work. ;)
Office (10.2/16) is Vlan100, 10.5/16 is 102, and all kinds of oddities. Would
you please regenerate that with my tunnel source set to "Vlan2"?
Is your VLAN ID in fact "2"? ;)