Sure - but I thought a VAXstation 4000/90 got like 40ish VUPS, whilst my relatively recent
Core 2 Duo + SIMH only get about 14?
I wonder how much faster say CHARON VAX would be, I gather it's quite thoroughly
optimised?
Sampsa
On 28 Nov 2010, at 22:13, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
When you run the PDP-11 simulator on a fast host then it willl blow the socks off any
hardware PDP-11. The same applies for the VAX of course. Even with the burden of a host OS
a 3 GHz Pentium has excess power to simulate a VAX whose own cpus's ran well below 200
MHz. And simh wasn't even optimized because it runs on a multitude of hosts.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
From: Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:14:33 +0000
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] SIMH VAX memory weirdness
Dell Latitude E6500 (it's a Core 2 Duo at 2.5 GHz I think), running Ubuntu Desktop,
Oracle VirtualBox and Ubuntu Server inside the VM, then I run SIMH inside the Ubuntu
server - this way the main host OS and the SIMH install can talk to each other over the
network.
I get about 7 VUPS on my Mac Mini (a 1.66 GHz Core Duo), so the 14 VUPS is about right, a
2.5 GHz Core 2 is about twice as fast as a 1.6 GHz Core...
Sampsa
On 28 Nov 2010, at 21:05, Steve Davidson wrote:
Sampsa,
What kind of a laptop and what OS are you running? The 3900 series systems ran about 38
VUPs and the 780 ran at 1 VUP...
-Steve
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of
Sampsa Laine
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 15:54
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] SIMH VAX memory weirdness
That worked!
Cool, I now have a 14 VUPS laptop with 512 megs of RAM. Just trying to get DECWINDOWS to
work, I'm assuming I can get it to display remotely even though it has no graphics
hardware built in, right?
Sampsa
On 28 Nov 2010, at 20:49, H Vlems wrote:
The VAX 11/780 may well have been limited to just 32 MB, I can t remember.
Try modifying PHYSICAL_PAGES, perhaps the microcode that comes with simh was modified.
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens Sampsa
Laine Verzonden: zondag, november 2010 21:46 Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Onderwerp:
Re: [HECnet] SIMH VAX memory weirdness
Ah, bummer - what about the 11/780? Sampsa On 28 Nov 2010, at 20:44, Steve
Davidson wrote: > Sampsa, > > I'm pretty sure that the 3900 series
machines only supported 64MB max > and that is what you are emulating. > >
-Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-hecnet at
Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On > Behalf Of Sampsa Laine >
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 15:41 > To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE > Subject:
Re: [HECnet] SIMH VAX memory weirdness > > Still only seeing 64 MB in the OS....
> > Sampsa > > > On 28 Nov 2010, at 20:27, Oleg Safiullin wrote:
> >> On 29.11.2010 2:20, Sampsa Laine wrote: >>> I just increased
the memory on one of my SIMH VAX VM's to 512 MB from > 64 MB - the system boots
fine but SHOW MEMORY (under OpenVMS 7.3-1) > still reports 64 MB. >>>
>>> Do I need to tell the VMS installation about the new RAM somehow? How >
much RAM does 7.3-1 (VAX) support anyway? >>> >>> Sampsa
>>> >>> >> >> Try to replace ka655.bin firmware with
the following file: >> >>
http://pdp-11.org.ru/~form/files/ka655x.bin
>
Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. Gecontroleerd door AVG -
www.avg.com Versie:
10.0.1170 / Virusdatabase: 426/3285 - datum van uitgifte: 11/28/10