Heh...? I wouldn't consider it a bug; I'd say it's more of a misfeature:
RSX is flagging an occasional malformed LAT packet by running out of memory.
Oh, /OK/; perhaps the reporting paradigm (going catatonic) could be
enhanced...
Of course, that begs the question of whether I'm being like most
reasonable people, being reasonable at all, or just plain being silly...? ?
On 11/8/21 5:20 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 11/8/21 4:49 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Just as a warning, the lat implementation have
some bugs. I've never
spent the time to figure it out, but at least when talking to RSX
hosts, it triggers some bug in RSX which cause it to leak memory, and
eventually RSX becomes catatonic.
? I think most reasonable people would consider that a bug in RSX, not
a bug in the Linux LAT implementation. ;)
???????????? -Dave