On 2013-01-17, at 9:19 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
What's the latency like?
[root at zork ~]# ping 192.168.42.1 -c 10
PING 192.168.42.1 (192.168.42.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=4.45 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=3.40 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=4.40 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3.30 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=4.46 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=2.87 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=8.04 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=3.42 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=3.38 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.42.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=4.52 ms
--- 192.168.42.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.878/4.229/8.042/1.395 ms
This is at the same time as I'm saturating the 10Mbps part of the network with a local
FTP of a 22Gb file that I need to move over to my Alpha machine.
I am very happy.
Ian