On 2014-05-25 19:04, Hans Vlems wrote:
You are absolutely correct, however what you see happening is strange.
The fact that performance sometimes sucks? It is not that strange. As I have mentioned a
few times, DECnet do *not* handle lots of lost packets very well. It will degrade to
horrendous performance.
This is easy to observe, if you have the right equipment around.
OK, I got the OS wrong. Because VMS and RT-11 are all I need :-)
:-)
That said, it should work. I'm not sure how RSX handled area routing but 30 years
ago we were warned to configure endnodes because ALL the overhead incurred by circuit
routers...
Huh? With ethernet, communication with adjacent nodes works without involving any routers
anyway. And if you need to talk with anything beyond, you're going to go through the
router on the way there anyway.
Really, unless you actually have several interfaces, there is no gain in running a router
compared to an endnode. However, running a router definitely use up more resources, which
is a disadvantage.
Anyway, i'd stop using the same 08-00-2B address on two nodes, shutdown the simulators
the VM host and the real iron.
Would still not make any difference, which I have pointed out several times now, and also
what Jean-Yves have been observing the last two days.
Really. There is no black magic here. I can explain every bit of it if someone needs more
convincing.
Essentially, the MAC address in the actual ethernet controller (or the MAC address set
before boot in simh) is irrelevant. Once DECnet starts running, that MAC address is not
used anymore. It is just a trivia piece of information so that you can know what the
hardware MAC address from the factory is. It is not used by anything, especially not
anything related to network communication.
The VM host in turn cares even less, since whatever MAC address simh plays around with is
fully local to simh, and does not affect the VM host.
Any questions?
Johnny
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
Van: Jean-Yves Bernier
Verzonden: zondag 25 mei 2014 18:47
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Same MAC address on different nodes
At 6:27 PM +0200 25/5/14, Hans Vlems wrote:
My apologies, it's been too long to remember rsx. A netgen is too
much work for an experiment.
No need to apologize :)
Background for the request: I had problems running two area routers
on the same lan, though just one was simh based. Both were VMS
though.
By running complex software under emulation, we take risks that
things don't work as expected. By adding a layer more with
virtualization, I take still more risks. What is amazing is that it
works most of the time.
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic
trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" -
B. Idol