23 Jun
2016
23 Jun
'16
4:55 p.m.
...it also exceeds the capabilities of a 2851.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 23, 2016, at 07:26, Cory Smelosky <b4 at
gewt.net> wrote:
My connection exceeds the capabilities of the 2620 or I would.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 23, 2016, at 05:30, Peter Lothberg
<roll at Stupi.SE> wrote:
Why don't you put your 2600 as your boarder-gw?
interface Tunnel1
ip address 192.108.195.70 255.255.255.252
ip router isis
ipv6 address 2001:440:1880:ABCD::2/64
ipv6 enable
ipv6 mtu 1420
ipv6 router isis
decnet cost 1
isis metric 2
tunnel source ATM0/1/0.1
tunnel destination 192.36.147.120
!
interface ATM0/1/0
mtu 4470
no ip address
ip virtual-reassembly in max-fragments 64 max-reassemblies 512
load-interval 30
atm restart timer 90
no atm ilmi-keepalive
dsl enable-training-log delay 0
dsl power-cutback 6
dsl noise-margin -2
dsl gain-setting rx-offset 3
dsl bitswap both
!
interface ATM0/1/0.1 point-to-point
mtu 4470
ip dhcp client broadcast-flag set
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
atm route-bridged ip
pvc 0/35
protocol bridge
encapsulation aal5snap
-P
`
On
23/06/2016 1:47 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Found the actual problem!
IPSec VTI VPNs means I can't do source-based NAT/firewall rules to redirect GRE from
the DECnet tunnel IPs to a separate box as is currently configured.
So, does this mean that you're still off the air?
Regards, Tim.