23 Dec
2021
23 Dec
'21
11:25 a.m.
Certainly sounds like Paul was doing M+ to PyDECnet. Not sure what more
combinations he might have been playing with.
Johnny
On 2021-12-23 10:14, R. Voorhorst wrote:
Hi Paul,
How was this tested: 11M+ to 11M+ or 11M+ to PyDecnet?
Reindert
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf
Of Paul Koning
Sent: Thursday, 23 December, 2021 02:36
To: hecnet at update.uu.se
Subject: Re: [HECnet] native Dup sync line revisited --> preliminary tests
reveals problems
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Dec 13, 2021, at 9:15 AM, Paul Koning
<paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
...
So if the plain sync device emulation were to do the above, that would
give us an
emulation that interoperates with the DMC emulation if the
software controlling the device is running DDCMP.
More on this...
I built an M+ system with DUP lines, and unlike what was reported in this
thread, I did NOT see problems talking to other things (like PyDECnet or DMC
emulation) that expect plain data without frame length fields. I don't see
frame lengths in the trace.
I don't understand this because the code is clearly there in the emulator,
so apparently it's not being hit. Not by DECnet/RSX anyway. More to be
studied.
paul