[HECnet] Worth getting a "VMS" keyboard?

Anyway, I'm going to get one of those 10-20 quid extended Mac keyboards from ebay and let you guys know how it works out. As far as I can tell, it has enough buttons to do pretty much anything an LK keyboard does, and like I said, Terminal.app lets you map the keys to any escape sequence etc you want. sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 17 Sep 2013, at 20:54, Kari Uusim ki <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org> wrote: Anyone tested the PowerTerm (which used to be included with the [later] Pathworks kits)? It's called PowerTerm Interconnect nowadays. Does it work correctly in all emulation cases? I haven't found bugs in VT emulation, but rather in HP 700 emulation, which was fixed very quickly after reporting it. I've found the support to be very responsive and to fix rapidly encountered and reported errors. Kari On 17.9.2013 19:20, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote: Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> writes: On 17/09/2013 17:04, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote: Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> writes: I'd also like to point out that the LK450 (which is the keyboard following on from the LK250 and was designed for connection to a PC running terminal emulation software) is a good alternative. Right. HOwever, I know people who purchased the USB LK keyboards for use with terminal emulation (Reflection specifically) and there are keys, when used in that scenario, that can not be mapped because the WEENDOZE driver simply doesn't recognize them. Absolutely - you can't use the LK450 with a PS/2 -> USB adapter and expect VMS-specific keys to be recognised fully. I have found that the only combination that works for me when using Windows is with the keyboard plugged directly into the PS/2 port and Exceed. This may also involve using the Reflection LK450 keyboard driver but I'm not sure about that without removing it. Bizarrely enough even with the driver Reflection doesn't do the right think. 25 years ago (a bit more|less) when DEXPO was still in full swing alongside DECUS, I dropped by the WRQ booth and asked to be introduced to any of the support/development staff that might be there. One such was right there in their booth, and I explained and demonstrated an improper handling of a some- what uncommon VT escape sequence. This was VT200/VT300 series at that time. That problem still has not been fixed. I don't use WEENDOZE or Reflection; however, I was on-site at one of the pharmaceuticals here in the proNJ about 5-6 years ago and they used Reflection. In fact, the reason I was there was because the problem they were experiencing with some software turned out to be not in the software on their VMS systems but in the software performing terminal emulation. Wanna wager a guess as to which product??? ;)