9 May
2016
9 May
'16
3:18 p.m.
Right. However, it is the sender - "julian at winax.org" that is the key.
This is a subscriber to HECnet, and is why the post went through. I
can't count the number of posts that do not get through. It's not that
the hecnet mailinglist address is secret. It's pretty well known address
and list. But it's kept in pretty short reins.
Johnny
On 2016-05-09 10:50, Johnny Eriksson wrote:
I haven't
even had to time to check yet, but faking the sender address
should be good enough to get on the hecnet list, but it does require
knowing the address of a subscribed member, as the hecnet list only
allows posts from subscribers...
Given:
To: "hecnet" <hecnet at update.uu.se>,
"hellwig.geisse"
<hellwig.geisse at mni.fh-giessen.de>,
"helmkera" <helmkera at gmail.com>, "hobbyist" <hobbyist
at montagar.com>,
"hoshina_minmi"
<hoshina_minmi at yahoo.co.jp>,
"hpb-ohio"
<wpd58nb6r69ccqy at marketplace.amazon.com>
its apparent that they got "lucky" with the hecnet list this time.
As I said, this has been around for some time, for example on the nanog
list.
Johnny
--Johnny