Oh, there's hardly any need for such language; they'll pretty much do
what you want if you threaten them with payment.
For residential offerings, which what Paul probably has, certain ports
are blocked for your 'benefit'; 25 being one of them for one of the
local carriers here.
So naturally I called up and whined about it to be promptly referred the
commercial offerings department whose basic business model appears to be
"Bring your wallet".? But a lot less was done for you (or to you).
I only know of one carrier here who will let you do whatever you want;
but they're great--no DHCP nonsense: you get a static IP for the same
price.? I used them for years until I moved to an area where they didn't
have service.? Darn near broke my heart...
On 5/5/20 6:05 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 5/5/20 5:22 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
The Cisco DECnet router implementation does not speak
"decnet management" as
we all knew. The way we are using them the tunnel end-points are on the Internet.
Most of the information "missing" is actually available through the SNMP MIB,
so if we could agree on a common read-only community and publish the IP addresses
of those routers it would be possible to complete Paul's map..
I would definitely be up for that. Maybe "hecnet-ro" for the community
name?
Regards, Tim.
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to be feasible. The issue is
that my ISP blocks SNMP outbound -- I have no idea why they would so such a thing. And as
far as I can tell there isn't any way to tell Cisco to accept incoming SNMP requests
on any port other than the standard one.
I would be on the phone with them
cursing a blue streak. I mean, do
they sell you a damn net connection, or not? There's life outside of
port 80! Wow.
One thing you might be able to do is create a port mapping coming into
whatever terminates the "web browsing connection" from your upstream
provider, on some port that they don't presume to block, forwarding back
to port 161 on the Cisco.
-Dave