A simple batch job will take care of this. Include in the batch job a
"resubmit" so that you do not have to remember to run the procedure in the
future. You might do it monthly or maybe even weekly.
The other direction is a bit more work, but certainly possible. At this point Johnny has
to ensure that no one creates a namespace collision by using the same node name twice.
-Steve
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Ian
McLaughlin
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 15:15
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] DECnet area router configuration
Does a COPY KNOWN NODES FROM xxx remove nodes in your local database that aren't
listed any more?
It's fairly easy to run a COPY KNOWN NODES command once in a while. I guess the only
piece missing is an automated way for MIM to get updates from everyone else.
Ian.
On 2009-12-03, at 12:10 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
The only (and this is a very minor) benefit that I can see in a distributed naming system
is that this way each owner of say an area could update the name database for his network
and have it automagically propagate, rather than a centralised system we have right now
which requires your time to keep up to date.
But it's not really that big a benefit to warrant the effort - just automate the
periodic copying of the database from MIM would be my suggestion as well...
Sampsa
On 3 Dec 2009, at 20:07, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Johnny Billquist wrote:
Node list don't even get transmitted within the same area.
Node names are local to each machine, and it is perfectly valid to have
different names for the same node number on different machines (although
perhaps confusing).
How hard would it be to write software as equivalent to DNS? Not necessarily for
general-purpose use, but just for HECnet?
For what? Just copying the nodename database between machines? The
software can already do that, so it would just be a question of
automating it a bit.
If you'd like to get a name lookup done from some central place at each
nodename lookup would be almost impossible. You'd need the source code
for DECnet, and the ability to recompile it for that to be possible. Not
likely, I'm afraid.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic
trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" -
B. Idol
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here:
http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=E4AFF6EEE04711DE9…