With VMS, it's also permissible to copy sys$system:netnode_remote.dat to other nodes,
mainly because no executor information is contained within this file.
Dune::netupdatev3.com is a modified form of the update script which does a purge/clear by
individual area, except for one's own area which is handled on a node by node basis,
including a configurable range within that area which is ignored. For example, it prevents
MIM:: from overriding 29.100-199 by default.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of
Johnny Billquist
Sent: 31 May 2021 20:48
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] SETNOD, Part 2
If there is some additional commands you'd like for me to put into FIX.T20, let me
know.
The VMS commandfile I creates starts like this:
$ MCR NCP
PURGE NODE * NAME
CLEAR NODE * NAME
def nod 41.28 name 28NH
.
.
.
Which means that any previous definitions are first cleared out before any definitions go
in.
This is because VMS (and RSX) do not handle if you have a node name that gets a different
address. Clearing things out first solves that.
The alternate thing that can be done in VMS is that you can copy nodenames from within NCP
from another node, which seems to avoid the problem as well (I think).
In RSX, the permanent nodename database in RSX can be created by a separate tool that does
not at all relates to the current nodename database, so in RSX it's rather easy. You
download a new database, and then you switch it over to the new db.
With other systems I don't know at all.
Johnny
On 2021-05-31 20:50, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
I was wondering if anybody would care to explain how
routine node
maintenance happens for DECnet on non-Tops-20 systems. Specifically,
Johnny's node list on MIM:: changes more or less about once a month,
sometimes more, sometimes less.
Is anybody keeping up on this?? How?? I had a (bi-weekly) re-occurring
batch job which NFT'ed the latest node file from MIM:: and simply used
SETNOD to shove the whole thing into the running monitor, on the
assumption that the monitor would figure out what to do.? While
slapping in the whole list (with .NDINT) during timesharing did strike
me as somewhat wasteful, I didn't pay much attention to the matter as it did work.
This is mistaken.? Tops-20 will not 'make it' work, nor does it
apparently detect certain situations which appear to be problematic.?
It does detect and reject two situations.
1. You may not change either the name or address of the host (I.E., the
Executor).? These can only be set once at boot up. Do other
operating systems have this restriction?
2. You may not change the address of an existing node in the local area.
A node insertion in the local area which usurps an address of another
node deletes that node.? Outside of the local area, you are on your
own.? It does whatever you want, which means that you can have
multiple nodes with the same address.? Is that a problem?? On IP4,
this would been known as 'aliasing', but I don't think DECnet allows this.
So it would appear that the appropriate behavior is that a new node
list implies a system reboot.? Unless I'm actively doing monitor
development, I can't stand doing this.
However, fixing the problem turned out to be pernicious.? Neither of
the two cases above is reported to the user program; there is no way
to determine what might have gone wrong.? There is no way for the user
program to proactively prevent errors because, while you can ask
Tops-20 to translate a DECnet address to a node name and to verify
that a DECnet node name exists, there is no way to return the address
for a verified DECnet node name.? Is this an oversight?? Can a user
program get the address of a DECnet node name on other operating systems?
I remediated the low level error reporting issue and implemented a new
function for NODE% to return the address of an existing DECnet node
(.NDVFX or Verify Node Extended).? Fixing SETNOD proved impossible.? I
discovered that the actions to be performed were complex enough when
automated that the dimensions of the solution were wholly beyond its
capabilities.? Not that there was anything wrong with SETNOD, it just
wasn't designed for this kind of heavy lift.? So I rewrote it from
scratch (cleverly naming it SETND2). I'm converging on completion, but
I don't work on it actively, so this will probably be a few more weeks.
Here is some sample output; let's suppose that BOINGO needs its
address changed from 2.399 to 2.400 and that this conflicts with
another node (in this case, APOLLO). To get this to work right, what
you need to do is tell Tops-20 to do is delete BOINGO first, so that
there is no name clash on the insertion.? Then you have to delete
APOLLO, so that there is no address conflict.? Once you are done
performing both these actions, it's safe to do the insertion and
Tops-20 doesn't reject it or otherwise get itself confused.
@*setnd2*
% Insufficient capabilities for INSERT command
SETNODE>*vERBOSITY* (level is) *vERBOSE *
Verbosity level is VERBOSE
SETNODE>*get /sECTION-MAP /nO-ACCESS*
[BIN file: TOMMYT:<SYSTEM>NODE-DATA.BIN.91;RESTRICTED-JFN:13 ] Mapped
one section (4 pages), 1778 Words, 889 Nodes.
SETNODE>*recONSTRUCT /sILENT *
[Closed log file: NUL:]
SETNODE>*shoW aREA 2 uNCHANGED*
[Area 2]
A2RTR?? ADAGIO? ADVENT? ADVNT5? AMAPUR? APOLLO? AUG11 AUGVAX? BASSET
BEAGLE? BELLS?? BOINGO? BOXER?? BULDOG? CHARON CODA??? COLLIE? CONDOR?
CORGI?? COYOTE? CYPHER? DALMTN DIVISI? DOGPAK ELIDYR? ELITE?? FOX????
GLDRTR? GLOVER? GRUNT HERMES? HUIA??? HUNTER? HUSKY?? JACKAL? JENSEN?
KELPIE LABRDR? LAPDOG LARGO?? LEGATO? LENTO?? MASTIF? MENTOR? MEZZO
MULTIA? MUTT??? NO0K??? ODST??? OINGO?? OSIRIS? PAVANE POCO??? POODLE
PUG???? PUGGLE? PUPPY?? R2X899? REACH?? SPARK TERIER? THEARK? TOMMYT?
VENTI?? WLFHND? WOLF??? ZITI Total nodes in area 2: 67
SETNODE>*shoW **uNCHANGED boiNGO*
BOINGO:: (2.399)
SETNODE>*set 2.400 boingo*
Set existing node BOINGO:: (2.400)
Node BOINGO:: (2.400)
% Removing node BOINGO:: (2.399) from same list to insert in the
delete list % Re-using key text for insertion in delete list, BOINGO
(2.399) % Removing BOINGO::'s previous address (2.399) % Removing node
APOLLO:: (2.400) from same list to insert in the delete list %
Re-using key text for insertion in delete list, APOLLO (2.400) %
Deleting APOLLO:: (2.400) to reassign its address to BOINGO::
% Allowing update request for node BOINGO:: (2.400) because being
deleted as (2.399) % Removing node BOINGO:: (2.399) from unchanged
list because its address has changed to (2.400) % Re-using key text
for insertion in update list, BOINGO (2.400) Node change request for
BOINGO:: (2.400)
SETNODE>
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol