yOn Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:19:02PM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 10/10/2013 01:16 PM, Hans Vlems wrote:
Fddi was the answer for production plants that required 100% uptime
Only once did Fddi let me down and made me go back to work at 3:30 am,
the worst time to wake up. One of the boards in a gs/fddi failed,
isolating two plants.
I did manage to explode a power supply in a gs. Made one hell of ?bang,
fortunately that part was redundant so the net stayed up.
Yuck!
Compared to fast ethernet, I prefer fddi.
Same here.
Too expensive for private or hobbyist use though.
Hardly. You just need the right connections. I was nearly 100% FDDI
on my home network in the mid-1990s...didn't take all that much money.
I didn't have much! ;)
Hell, when I got into FDDI in the early 2000s it was cheaper than
FastEthernet!
-brian
I was contemplating making my house 4-way redundant. MoCa. FE,
FibreChannel, and FDDI. All to link to the basement.
If I had the cables I woulda done it, too...
You're weird. :)
Thank you!
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects