On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 12 Feb 2013, at 00:29, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 02/12/2013 05:56 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote:
"They're using sophisticated technology to degrade service, which
probably costs them a lot of money. It would be better to see them use
that money to improve service"
So why is anyone (Dave) buying their service?
I'm buying their service because it's the best service I can get here. (and
it's significantly better than the best I could get in either Florida or DC, at least
when I lived there) And it's cheaper by about 30% than what I had in Florida, though
that was not a consideration, as my connectivity is my livelihood. As a bonus, for that
30% discount, I have more than twice the bandwidth and far, far better reliability. (I was
on Sprint business class in Florida)
Eeeek. Sprint! The horror...
I am 100% happy with Comcast Business. They are a class act. (with the exception of that
routing hole, which I will investigate!) Please keep in mind that this is NOT the same
organization, business model, or staff as the consumer-grade shared cable network service.
(There's fiber to the pole outside my building!)
You've just reminded me...a bunch of the fibre AT&T put down in the '80s...why
is a lot of it still dark?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Hello!
That? It was supposed to be rolled into two things, I believe it
might have been part of a long distance roll out, and even fast
Internet access for those specialty houses.
And guess who bought access to a lot of it?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at
gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."