5 Jun
2016
5 Jun
'16
7:49 p.m.
Hi, Jordi.
Yes, that is definitely a BRU tape.
I have published the tool before, and don't mind sharing it again. But I
also already have a good copy of C81, I believe.
You are on HECnet, right? Let me know, and I'll just pass it to you there.
Johnny
On 2016-06-05 10:34, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Hi Johnny,
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
ElMore specifically, I?m looking for an usable
COBOL-81 compiler. The one which is not corrupted (cobol_v4_4) is COBOL/C11, not COBOL 81,
and even for hobbyist stuff, handling COBOL-74 is a PITA?
I wrote a tool that can fix BRU tapes. I can't remember if the Cobol-81 tape is a BRU
tape. If it is a DOS-11 tape, then you're in for a lot of headaches...
Well, cobol_81_v3_1.tpc looks like a BRU tape. Going thru ?strings? it shows:
VOL1BACKUP D%B1111001001 1
***THIS VOLUME DOES NOT CONTAIN A HARDWARE BOOTABLE SYSTEM ***
^L@^LB^L
HDR1AUT101.A
00010001000100 00000 00000 000000DECFILE11A P
HDR2U0414404144 M 00
AUT101.A
USER1
16OCT90135110
DECN
***THIS VOLUME DOES NOT CONTAIN A HARDWARE BOOTABLE SYSTEM ***
^L@^LB^L
USER1
/29NOV88183932
USER1
[001,001] DECFILE11A
HEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADHEADP
Looks like a BRU-based autoin install kit to me :)
Moreover, the datatrieve 3.3 tape (datatrive_rsx_v3_3a.tpc) seems to be a BRU tape also?
I have not checked other files. I remember BP2 2.7 is a DOS-11 tape.
Have you make public your fixing tool? If so, I?ll give it a try?