This is what my ipnet location shows. Is it MLTCFG.TSK?
Kurt
Directory DU0:[IPNET]
6-JUN-2019 16:19
INS.CMD;172 2. 27-JUN-2018 12:32
INSHECNET.CMD;1 2. 10-JAN-2018 05:47
INS.NEW;208 2. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPNET.NEW;106 2. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPNET.CMD;208 5. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IP.OBJ;208 13. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MLTNET.TSK;209 16. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MLTCOM.TSK;208 14. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MLTCOM.STB;208 1. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MLTCFG.TSK;208 18. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPLN.DAT;208 1. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IP.DAT;208 1. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPDF.MAC;208 2. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPNCONFIG.CMD;106 4. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IP.TSK;197 3. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IP.STB;197 1. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
Total of 87./87. blocks in 16. files
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:13 PM Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
Well, my point was just that ethernet is a better
local networking than
point-to-point multinet links. But of course multinet links also works.
And I remember wrong. All the multinet stuff for RSX is under [IPNET]
Johnny
On 2019-06-06 21:26, Kurt Hamm wrote:
I am looking in IP and there isn't anything
for MNC.
In terms of topology, I currently have two 3900s, Larry and Moe. Larry
is configured for the connection to HECNet. Moe is configured (decnet
over IP) to connect to Larry. This seems to work with both servers
being able to set host and see files on HECNet.
My idea was that I could have the PDP-11 (Frodo) point to Larry as well
via DECNet over IP.
Is this what you are describing?
Kurt
Directory DU0:[IP]
6-JUN-2019 15:09
NTPDATE.TSK;210 63. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
NTPDATRES.TSK;210 42. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MAILD.TSK;123 237. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
PCL.TSK;210 63. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
PCLRES.TSK;213 33. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IFDRV.TSK;213 7. C 13-JAN-2019 14:47
IPDRV.TSK;213 14. C 13-JAN-2019 14:47
UDDRV.TSK;213 16. C 13-JAN-2019 14:48
TCDRV.TSK;213 35. C 13-JAN-2019 14:48
IFCONFIG.TSK;424 37. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
NETSTAT.TSK;424 23. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
PING.TSK;424 64. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
TRACERT.TSK;424 16. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
ETHACP.TSK;424 25. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
RESACP.TSK;424 24. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
RMD.TSK;400 217. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
DHCP.TSK;409 67. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
DHCPRES.TSK;409 45. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
RWHOD.TSK;396 15. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
TFTPD.TSK;396 64. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
INETD.TSK;409 12. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
SPOOF.TSK;409 12. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
WWW.TSK;409 117. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
WWWRES.TSK;409 94. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IRCBOT.TSK;409 66. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
FTPD.TSK;409 62. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
TELNETD.TSK;408 26. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
TELNET.TSK;408 41. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
TFTP.TSK;394 106. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IRC.TSK;408 72. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IRCRES.TSK;395 46. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
FTP.TSK;409 67. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
TELCOM.TSK;402 3. C 13-JAN-2019 14:48
Total of 1831./1831. blocks in 33. files
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:17 PM Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
If you have my TCP/IP installed, and you have generated DECnet with
the
Multinet lines, then things should be pretty
easy. MNC might not be
installed, but MNC.TSK should be in [IP], so just install it then.
However, do you really have all your DECnet machines on separate
ethernets? Otherwise I would really recommend that you have DECnet on
your local ethernet, and just have one machine which is the router to
the outside from the ethernet segment. Individual point-to-point
links
will not be as efficient as the ethernet.
Johnny
On 2019-06-06 21:09, Kurt Hamm wrote:
New issue. I am working to setup my (Oscar)
PiDP-11 on HECNet
(Decnet). The docs say that I need to run MNC to setup the links
for
DECNet, but I can't find that application
anywhere. I am
assuming that,
for the PiDP-11, NETGEN and IPNET have been
completed. I just
need to
configure my circuits and make sure the PiDP-11
has the correct
area.node.
RSX-11M+ newbie, so sorry if I am missing something basic.
Kurt
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:53 PM Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at
softjar.se>>> wrote:
On 2019-06-06 15:04, Kurt Hamm wrote:
> I wasn't sure where to post this question, so I thought I
would
start here.
>
> I have two simh vax3900 machines. Larry and Moe. Larry
is the
HECNet
router for Moe.
When I send email from Larry (via SMTP), the _return _email
address is
> correct (SYSTEM at
LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM <mailto:SYSTEM at
LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM>
<mailto:SYSTEM at
LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM
<mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM>>
<mailto:SYSTEM at
LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM <mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM>
<mailto:SYSTEM at
LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM
<mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM>>>.
>
> When I send email from Moe (to
LARRY::SMTP%"user at
domain.com
<mailto:user at domain.com>
<mailto:user at
domain.com <mailto:user
at domain.com>>
> <mailto:user at
domain.com <mailto:user at domain.com>
<mailto:user at
domain.com <mailto:user at domain.com>>>"), the
return
email address is:
> SYSTEM at
SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM <mailto:SYSTEM at
SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM>
<mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM>>
<mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM>
<mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM>>>.
> >
> > Why is Moe using the SCSSYSTEMID instead of the system
name?
> >
> > *I am missing something.*
>
> I'm not sure how you should do a setup of mail relaying in
VMS.
However, you can always send from Moe to MIM::user at
domain.com
<mailto:MIM%3A%3Auser at domain.com>
<mailto:MIM%3A%3Auser at
domain.com
<mailto:MIM%253A%253Auser at domain.com>>. Those
mails should then get correct addresses.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>
<mailto:bqt
at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> ||
Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" -
B.
Idol
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se> ||
Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol