15 Jan
2016
15 Jan
'16
4:14 p.m.
On 2016-01-15 15:49, Robert Armstrong wrote:
Having multiple area routers, by the way, is not something odd. It's
called redundancy. And also, there is nothing saying that all area
routers need to be connected to the same other nodes.
But as soon as you do have two area routers, even if they have different
external connections, you will once more get asymmetrical setups.
Really. I can easily give you examples of that as well.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Let me give
you the same example I just gave Peter in a private mail.
The problem with your example is that you have one area (1 in your case) that has more
than one area router AND all of them have external links. Worse, some of those multiple
area routers for area 1 have links to the same external machine. The problem is just a
badly thought out network topology. If area 1 had only one gateway to the external world,
then all would be well.
Now you're going to tell me "yes, but I don't want to do it that
way". That's fine, but like I said - the problem isn't with the technology.