3 Mar
2026
3 Mar
'26
1:24 a.m.
On 2026-03-02 19:01, Paul Koning wrote:
Yeah. Could definitely be done. But I haven't done it for now. And I
really don't see much reason to do it. It's just extra overhead in bytes
and processing for no gain.
But if someone *really* wants it, I guess it could be done.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt(a)softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Mar 2, 2026, at 12:57 PM, Johnny Billquist
<bqt(a)softjar.se>wrote;wrote:
...
And RSX only speaks Multinet. DDCMP without the Multinet headers are not dealt with. I
guess it would be possible to add, but then I'd have to process and understand when
one frame ends, so I can give it to DECnet properly.
But that is trivial. If it's a control frame, it's just a header. If it's a
data (or maintenance) frame, it's header plus the data length given in the header,
plus 2 bytes for the data CRC.