[HECnet] HECnet performance....

Peter, Everything is now set up on my end. I now have 3 Cisco tunnels. The metric is 10 on all of them. The majority of areas now route through you according to my router: a42rtr#sh dec rout Area Cost Hops Next Hop to Node Expires Prio *1 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *2 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *3 14 3 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *4 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *5 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *6 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *7 12 3 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *8 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *11 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *12 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *18 12 3 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *19 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *20 12 3 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *28 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *33 12 3 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *42 0 0 (Local) -> 42.1023 *44 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *47 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 *52 10 1 Tunnel1 -> 52.1 39 64 A+ *59 10 1 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 38 64 A+ *61 10 1 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 43 64 A+ *62 11 2 Tunnel2 -> 59.11 Node Cost Hops Next Hop to Node Expires Prio *(Area) 0 0 (Local) -> 42.1023 *42.1 1 1 FastEthernet5/0 -> 42.1 38 *42.2 1 1 FastEthernet5/0 -> 42.2 41 *42.42 1 1 FastEthernet5/0 -> 42.42 33 *42.1023 0 0 (Local) -> 42.1023 a42rtr# On 2013-01-08, at 12:15 PM, Peter Lothberg <roll at Stupi.SE> wrote: Do we have a 'standard' metric for Cisco routers on Hecnet? I've been = using 10 for each link so far. How do these devices behave with = asymmetrical costs? You get asymetric routes. I will (tomorrow) get it all correct on my side, but as the uppsala box is "central" to HECnet, you are better of forcing the traffic there as we have no metrics/topology info from the bridged ethernet. Then we use the stockholm/reston boxes as backup together with the Multinet links.. --P . --- Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=3CA515C859D011E2A…