On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 11 Feb 2013, at 17:35, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 11 Feb 2013, at 17:33, Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
On 11 Feb 2013, at 21:41, Dave McGuire wrote:
That I won't argue with. That reminds me, I need to get my PDP-11
emulation back up and running. I'm actually missing using RSX-11 M+
(there's something wrong with me, I swear. It's Johnny's fault! :P
).
EVERYTHING is Johnny's fault. ;) Bring up that PDP-11! (even if it's
not real iron!)
I think I've heard that before (Jonny's fault ;-), while I may not
necessarily agree with it.
Eh, Ma ana. It takes me over an hour to do a fresh SYSGEN and NETGEN and I haven't
done it in ages so I'll be out of practice.
I do want to get it running again though and delve a little deeper into RSX-11 :)
Which reminds me, I need to get my RSX-11M+ VM back up?shame E11 has no x86_64 build?the
distro I run doesn't have an i386 compat layer.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
Anyway, back on topic: I think running NT 4 on this is a lost cause. ;)
Um...yes, I believe there is a support disk (as I mentioned a week back),
I have TSE running on both of my White Elephants (DecServer 3300s). But I
would have to agree with Dave, that it is kind of like strapping a couch
to your Ferrari (sure it will work, but it is not very practical). This
was the first install I did on my 3300s and that was BEFORE Y2k. And both
of these machines have been turned off for years. :(
I think i'm going to go try Tru64.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Yes, this would be a much better approach. ;-)
Brett