On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 01/15/2014 06:42 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
A lot of people (myself included) insisted on direct-in-the-bus
printer controllers when we saw how badly serial printers tanked the
system when we connected them to DZ11s. ;)
Oh I can imagine that. A dedicated controller would have MUCH higher
bandwidth than the <1.5mbitcapable on the DZ11. ;)
It's the interrupt load that's the problem. It could TANK an 11/750.
Didn't the DZ11 depend on the CPU for interrupts?
Every interrupt depends on the CPU. ;)
True...but offloading helps cut down on the other stuff it needs to process. ;)
Isn't that why say...the DHV11 had processors to offload serial
processing to?
The DHV11 has a pair of 8051s on it. The DH11 is several boards full
of logic. It has buffering and DMA capability to offload the host
system...it needs much less hand-holding than the DZ11.
Ahh. I thought it was something like that.
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects