You might have been unlucky and caught things exactly at a point where I
restarted decnet-1-1023. Since it's PyDECnet, any changes in
configuration requires a restart, and I'm doing changes to the config
quite often right now.
Johnny
On 2021-11-22 17:05, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
Then I think I got a false negative from the 36 bit
DECnet 'ping' utility.
NETPTH>*venti*
[Routing path from VENTI2 (2.522) to VENTI (2.20)]
?From?????? ???? ? Via??????? Back????????? Thru ????? Cost??? Hops
VENTI2 (2.522)??? =>NI-0-0?? /BRG-0?? <=??? A2RTR (2.1023)????? 5????? 2
A2RTR? (2.1023)?? =>DUP-1??? /KDP-0-0 <=??? VENTI (2.20)??? ?? -1?? ? -1
NETPTH>*mim*
[Routing path from VENTI2 (2.522) to MIM (1.13)]
?From?????? ???? ? Via??????? Back????????? Thru ???? ?? Cost??? Hops
VENTI2 (2.522)??? =>NI-0-0?? /BRG-0?? <=??? A2RTR (2.1023)
-1??? -1
A2RTR? (2.1023)?? =>MUL-1??? /
?NETPTH NTMAN failed, reason:
Parameter missing
I immediately tested with the node fetch batch job and it worked fine:
10:38:42 USER MIM::DU1:[DECNET]
10:38:42 USER?? FIX.T20;122;P775656???????????? 17 33280(8)
21-Nov-2021 23:00:10
On 11/22/21 11:02 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> Hi. MIM will continue to be the source. And now Mim.Update.UU.SE is a
> CNAME to
Mim.Stupi.NET, so hopefully nothing needs to change anywhere.
>
> ? Johnny
>
> On 2021-11-22 16:58, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
>> Hi Johhny,
>>
>> Will MIM continue to be the online source of record for the T20.CMD
>> node list?? Or should I go elsewhere to fetch it?
>>
>> --T
>>
>> On 11/22/21 10:52 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>> On 2021-11-22 16:51, Robert Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Peter Lothberg <roll at stupi.com> wrote:
>>>>> hecnet-1023, 192.108.202.70? is UP but I drop all packets towards
>>>>> it that
>>>>> are not HECnet tunnels in one or the other form.. (linux.....)
>>>>
>>>> ?? Did you include Multinet in your rules?
>>>>
>>>> ?? A2RTR used to have a Multinet tunnel to MIM (Johnny's RSX TCP/IP
>>>> stack supports that), and when I change it to
>>>>
>>>> ????circuit MUL-1 Multinet hecnet-1-1023.stupi.net:700:connect
>>>> --cost=12
>>>>
>>>> it doesn't connect.? FWIW, the previous connection was
>>>>
>>>> ????#circuit MUL-1 Multinet mim.update.uu.se:700:connect --cost=12
>>>
>>> Sorry, that would be my fault. I saw that Peter had some comments
>>> about links to you in the config, so I didn't do anything. Let me
>>> set you up as with Mim before then, but to hecnet-1-1023. In a sec...
>>>
>>> ? Johnny
>>>
>
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol