On 10/25/25 23:46, Tony Nicholson wrote:
          Hi folks, has anyone here used a Lantronix
ETS-series or similar
     terminal server for LAT connections to RSX?  We're having a strange
 
 I have a Lantronix ETS8P running software version V3.6/5(010208)
 that I use to bridge various RS-232 serial devices to LAT services
 on OpenVMS, RSX-11, RSTS/E etc.
 
 I don't see any issues to any of my machines (and I have a few older images
 that can be MOP downline loaded to the Lantronix if you need them for
 V3.5/9, V3.6/1, V3.6/4) 
   Hi Tony.  We use them much as you do, with local services to system 
consoles as well as for terminals and printers.  They've been working 
very well for us since we migrated to them recently from a set of 
DECservers.
   I typed this up for Johnny a couple of hours ago so I'll just paste 
it here:
   We have three Lantronix ETS-series terminal servers on the network; 
we just replaced four DECserver-300s with them.  They are performing 
great and give us some additional functionality that we wanted.
   But we have hit one snag that is just...weird.  Either of the two 
RSX-11M-PLUS machines that we've tried (an 11/70 and an 11/53) both do 
this.  From one specific terminal server, when we connect to the LAT 
service, it gets a connection (and LCP shows it as connected) but there 
is no login prompt.  It is completely unresponsive.
   The other two terminal servers work just fine, and other machines 
(several VAXen, two Linux machines, etc) can connect to that LAT service 
just fine, meaning we get the ">" immediately and can log in.
   The configurations of the terminal servers are identical.  The only 
difference is that the one with the problem is a 32-port unit and the 
two that work are 16-port units.
   Connections to any other service from the affected terminal server 
work fine, including connections to RSTS/E on the very same PDP-11s. 
(most of our machines are set up with multiple system disks for 
different OSs)
   The next time we work on this, possibly next week, we're going to do 
some packet captures.
   Do you have any thoughts on this?
            -Dave
-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA