Mark Thomas has joined us in the Cisco tunnel system!
Now I just need to hunt down Mark Darvill and see why his tunnel isn't
working.
Oh, and that Cory guy. His tunnel is still broken. *shakes fist at Cory*
:)
At this point in time we have 7 tunnel members. Yay!
-brian
On 2014-05-24 12:11, Jean-Yves Bernier wrote:
Node 10.1
Line = QNA-0
Controller = Normal
Counter timer = Off
Protocol = ETHERNET
Hardware address = 08-00-2B-AA-BB-CC
Controller CSR = 174440, Vector = 120
Priority = 5
Node 10.2
Line = QNA-0
Controller = Normal
Counter timer = Off
Protocol = ETHERNET
Hardware address = 08-00-2B-AA-BB-CC
Controller CSR = 174440, Vector = 120
Priority = 5
Shouldn't be AA-00-04-00-01-28 and AA-00-04-00-02-28 ?
The line information tells you what the *hardware* MAC address is.
Try "SHOW EXEC STAT" instead. :-)
Both nodes under simh.
The network is working, however.
Is it required to SET XQ MAC to match node address?
I guess it might depend on the version of simh and host system.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2014-05-24 11:52, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
SET /UIC=[1,24]
SET /UIC=[200,200]
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
Clean install. Autoconfiguration. Followed all suggestions. This is
getting _ANNOYING_.
This with M+ 4.6?
I seem to remember seeing a bug reported at some point that might be this.
If I remember right then it's just a stupid small error. Try editing [200,200]SGNPREFIX.CMD, and add the following line somewhere appropriate:
.SETF $U$DAS
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2014-05-24 11:39, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-24 11:24, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the
floating space.
Assigning them in the floating space is what confuses me. ;)
What devices do you have in the machine.
Let me know, and I'll give you the addresses.
DLV11-J, DHV11, DELQA, MSCP SCSI controller
All of those should fit at the standard addresses I believe.
Like I said. A DHV11 do not have a standard address. They only live in the floating space.
Anyway:
With this setup, the DHV11 should be at 160440.
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first
one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
What threw me off was that the DHV11's address in the manual was 22-bit
and SYSGEN wanted 18-bit. ;)
Really? I was pretty sure SYSGEN actually asks for 16 bits... :-)
Whoops. 16 felt too small to me so I assumed 18. ;)
IND only do 16-bit arithmetic. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Node 10.1
Line = QNA-0
Controller = Normal
Counter timer = Off
Protocol = ETHERNET
Hardware address = 08-00-2B-AA-BB-CC
Controller CSR = 174440, Vector = 120
Priority = 5
Node 10.2
Line = QNA-0
Controller = Normal
Counter timer = Off
Protocol = ETHERNET
Hardware address = 08-00-2B-AA-BB-CC
Controller CSR = 174440, Vector = 120
Priority = 5
Shouldn't be AA-00-04-00-01-28 and AA-00-04-00-02-28 ?
Both nodes under simh.
The network is working, however.
Is it required to SET XQ MAC to match node address?
--
Jean-Yves Bernier
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
SET /UIC=[1,24]
SET /UIC=[200,200]
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
Clean install. Autoconfiguration. Followed all suggestions. This is getting _ANNOYING_.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-24 11:24, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the
floating space.
Assigning them in the floating space is what confuses me. ;)
What devices do you have in the machine.
Let me know, and I'll give you the addresses.
DLV11-J, DHV11, DELQA, MSCP SCSI controller
All of those should fit at the standard addresses I believe.
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first
one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
What threw me off was that the DHV11's address in the manual was 22-bit
and SYSGEN wanted 18-bit. ;)
Really? I was pretty sure SYSGEN actually asks for 16 bits... :-)
Whoops. 16 felt too small to me so I assumed 18. ;)
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6
will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Indeed.
And 4.6 is better than 4.3
Yup. I even copied the pre-made baseline image so I could get the
networking bits easily. They're on DU2.
Good.
Yeah. Assuming I can get it on to DU1...which is set as an RA81 for PLENTY of disk.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-24 11:24, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the
floating space.
Assigning them in the floating space is what confuses me. ;)
What devices do you have in the machine.
Let me know, and I'll give you the addresses.
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first
one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
What threw me off was that the DHV11's address in the manual was 22-bit
and SYSGEN wanted 18-bit. ;)
Really? I was pretty sure SYSGEN actually asks for 16 bits... :-)
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6
will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Indeed.
And 4.6 is better than 4.3
Yup. I even copied the pre-made baseline image so I could get the
networking bits easily. They're on DU2.
Good.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the floating space.
Assigning them in the floating space is what confuses me. ;)
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
What threw me off was that the DHV11's address in the manual was 22-bit and SYSGEN wanted 18-bit. ;)
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6
will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Indeed.
And 4.6 is better than 4.3
Yup. I even copied the pre-made baseline image so I could get the networking bits easily. They're on DU2.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-24 11:18, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-23 20:42, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Is it possible to have SYSGEN do an autoconfigure again? I'd love to
not have to rely on my incorrect answers. ;)
I think not. Autoconfigure is only run if you are on the baseline
system, if I remember right.
However, that then also depends on you setting the CSR right. You know
about the rules for CSR assignments, right?
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are
floating?
Well, I was referring to the rules about how to assign CSRs in the floating space.
But yes, for those devices that have a fixed address for the first one, the first one is easy. :-)
(DHVs do not have a fixed address.)
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6
will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Indeed.
And 4.6 is better than 4.3
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-23 20:42, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Is it possible to have SYSGEN do an autoconfigure again? I'd love to
not have to rely on my incorrect answers. ;)
I think not. Autoconfigure is only run if you are on the baseline system, if I remember right.
However, that then also depends on you setting the CSR right. You know about the rules for CSR assignments, right?
They can't conflict, first one of certain devices is set, rest are floating?
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Thanks! I got RSX-11M+ 4.6 on it and I'm doing a SYSGEN there now. 4.6 will be better than 4.3.
I'm fine with half a board less RAM so long as it WORKS.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-23 20:42, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Is it possible to have SYSGEN do an autoconfigure again? I'd love to
not have to rely on my incorrect answers. ;)
I think not. Autoconfigure is only run if you are on the baseline system, if I remember right.
However, that then also depends on you setting the CSR right. You know about the rules for CSR assignments, right?
(By the way, congrats on getting the machine running.)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Sent from mobile device that advertises itself for no good reason
On 24 May 2014, at 02:02, John Wilson <wilson at dbit.com> wrote:
From: Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net>
Uhhh. Trying to sysgen before copying:
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
WTF?
Seems to mean user data-space support. Question CE060 on my config...
Thanks. Now that I know the question I can find the error.
John Wilson
D Bit
From: Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net>
Uhhh. Trying to sysgen before copying:
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
WTF?
Seems to mean user data-space support. Question CE060 on my config...
John Wilson
D Bit
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Hans Vlems wrote:
Bad csr for the new DHV?
If I was specifying one...possibly. This is as base as a config can get. Once I test it'll boot with the SIMH cpu set to an 11/23+ I'll copy it over to the real thing.
( you do know I 'm just guessing, right)
Yup. ;)
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
?? Van: Cory Smelosky
Verzonden: zaterdag 24 mei 2014 07:10
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] RSX-11 SYSGEN issues
Uhhh. Trying to sysgen before copying:
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
WTF?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Bad csr for the new DHV?
( you do know I 'm just guessing, right)
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
Van: Cory Smelosky
Verzonden: zaterdag 24 mei 2014 07:10
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] RSX-11 SYSGEN issues
Uhhh. Trying to sysgen before copying:
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
WTF?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Hans Vlems wrote:
Do you know what AT.T0 refers to?
Its the @ task...right? This is on a baseline image grabbed straight from bitsavers.
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
?? Van: Cory Smelosky
Verzonden: zaterdag 24 mei 2014 07:10
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] RSX-11 SYSGEN issues
Uhhh. Trying to sysgen before copying:
AT.T0 -- Undefined symbol $U$DAS
.IFT $U$DAS .SETS $FCPNM "FCPLRGID"
WTF?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
SET -- Device offline or privileged diagnosti
Close to getting the DHV11 going...need to read the HELP.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Hans Vlems wrote:
Good soldering!
I cheated. They were socketed. ;)
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
?? Van: Cory Smelosky
Verzonden: vrijdag 23 mei 2014 20:06
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] RSX-11 booted!
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I did it!
3 x 64kbit x 1 DRAM chips bad, disabled half the board:
boot [1,54]rsx11m
XDT: 66
XDT>g
RSX-11M-PLUS V4.3 BL66
sav /wb
RSX-11M-PLUS V4.3 BL66 256.KW System:"MINDY "
RED DU:=SY:
RED DU:=LB:
RED DU:=SP:
MOU DU:"RSX11MPBL66"
@DU:[1,2]STARTUP
A lot of my problem was XDT user error. Whoops.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Good soldering!
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
Van: Cory Smelosky
Verzonden: vrijdag 23 mei 2014 20:06
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] RSX-11 booted!
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I did it!
3 x 64kbit x 1 DRAM chips bad, disabled half the board:
boot [1,54]rsx11m
XDT: 66
XDT>g
RSX-11M-PLUS V4.3 BL66
sav /wb
RSX-11M-PLUS V4.3 BL66 256.KW System:"MINDY "
RED DU:=SY:
RED DU:=LB:
RED DU:=SP:
MOU DU:"RSX11MPBL66"
@DU:[1,2]STARTUP
A lot of my problem was XDT user error. Whoops.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Jean-Yves Bernier wrote:
At 2:42 PM -0400 23/5/14, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Is it possible to have SYSGEN do an autoconfigure again?
If you run it from the beginning (not using saved answers), yes.
Ahh. Okay.
Well first comes figuring out RSX-11 job control so I can stop the macro assembly. ;)
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Jean-Yves Bernier wrote:
At 2:42 PM -0400 23/5/14, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Is it possible to have SYSGEN do an autoconfigure again?
If you run it from the beginning (not using saved answers), yes.
Ahh. Okay.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
