On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/27/2013 04:16 AM, goran ahling wrote:
As I remember the SYSGEN/NETGEN task, the controller intended for DECnet
should NOT be taken into SYSGEN at all, but later, at the totally
separate task of performing NETGEN once Your OS. is up and running, it
should be included there. So, no need to redo your SYSGEN when playing
with different Ethernet cards.
Ahh, excellent. Thank you.
I've run into a snag, though. I'm trying to allow sysgen to
autoconfigure the hardware via ACF, and it hangs on my 11/24 system.
I've tried with both 4.3 and 4.6. Thinking it might have something to
do with my recently-installed and untested DELUA, I removed it, but I
get the same result.
Voltages stable? Backplane clean?
So I completed sysgens via manual hardware configuration entry, both
with and without the DELUA. Both sysgen runs completed successfully,
but the system hangs when I try to boot the new executive.
The hardware is, as far as I can tell, otherwise fine. I built the
system up from parts a few weeks ago, and have exercised it with RT-11.
Everything seems ok. The baseline RSX system boots just fine.
I've set up an identically-configured instance of simh, and run
through the same process on that, and it works.
Interesting. Maybe a fault due to a difference betweren RSX and RT-11
drivers?
My next step is to pull it out of the rack and triple check things
like the memory boards' CSRs and such, etc., but I thought I'd ask here
first.
I last ran an RSX sysgen almost thirty years ago, and I barely
remember it at all...but I'm certain nothing like this happened. That
was on an 11/34 with RL01s, RL02s, and RK07s.
Any thoughts?
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Hello!
Do what I do when I get confronted by a very unhappy system. Examine
all of the steps you followed to get that far. And remember, the
system you are looking at has a reason for being unhappy, and it
probably isn't yourself.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2013 04:16 AM, goran ahling wrote:
As I remember the SYSGEN/NETGEN task, the controller intended for DECnet
should NOT be taken into SYSGEN at all, but later, at the totally
separate task of performing NETGEN once Your OS. is up and running, it
should be included there. So, no need to redo your SYSGEN when playing
with different Ethernet cards.
Ahh, excellent. Thank you.
I've run into a snag, though. I'm trying to allow sysgen to
autoconfigure the hardware via ACF, and it hangs on my 11/24 system.
I've tried with both 4.3 and 4.6. Thinking it might have something to
do with my recently-installed and untested DELUA, I removed it, but I
get the same result.
So I completed sysgens via manual hardware configuration entry, both
with and without the DELUA. Both sysgen runs completed successfully,
but the system hangs when I try to boot the new executive.
The hardware is, as far as I can tell, otherwise fine. I built the
system up from parts a few weeks ago, and have exercised it with RT-11.
Everything seems ok. The baseline RSX system boots just fine.
I've set up an identically-configured instance of simh, and run
through the same process on that, and it works.
My next step is to pull it out of the rack and triple check things
like the memory boards' CSRs and such, etc., but I thought I'd ask here
first.
I last ran an RSX sysgen almost thirty years ago, and I barely
remember it at all...but I'm certain nothing like this happened. That
was on an 11/34 with RL01s, RL02s, and RK07s.
Any thoughts?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 12/27/2013 04:16 AM, goran ahling wrote:
As I remember the SYSGEN/NETGEN task, the controller intended for DECnet
should NOT be taken into SYSGEN at all, but later, at the totally
separate task of performing NETGEN once Your OS. is up and running, it
should be included there. So, no need to redo your SYSGEN when playing
with different Ethernet cards.
Ahh, excellent. Thank you.
I've run into a snag, though. I'm trying to allow sysgen to
autoconfigure the hardware via ACF, and it hangs on my 11/24 system.
I've tried with both 4.3 and 4.6. Thinking it might have something to
do with my recently-installed and untested DELUA, I removed it, but I
get the same result.
So I completed sysgens via manual hardware configuration entry, both
with and without the DELUA. Both sysgen runs completed successfully,
but the system hangs when I try to boot the new executive.
The hardware is, as far as I can tell, otherwise fine. I built the
system up from parts a few weeks ago, and have exercised it with RT-11.
Everything seems ok. The baseline RSX system boots just fine.
I've set up an identically-configured instance of simh, and run
through the same process on that, and it works.
My next step is to pull it out of the rack and triple check things
like the memory boards' CSRs and such, etc., but I thought I'd ask here
first.
I last ran an RSX sysgen almost thirty years ago, and I barely
remember it at all...but I'm certain nothing like this happened. That
was on an 11/34 with RL01s, RL02s, and RK07s.
Any thoughts?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 12/30/2013 11:29 AM, lee.gleason at comcast.net wrote:
It's my month for trying to read old media. I've been going through
my collection to try and eliminate bulky things I won't be using. I came
across around 10 reel to reel mag tapes from RSX and VMS, from my early
DEC career, that I would like to see about getting copied to SIMH tape
format.
If a stack of 9-track tapes is "bulky" to you, you would HATE my place. ;)
Does anyone on the list here in the US still have a working 9 track
tape drive on their systems, that would be willing to convert these at a
hobbyist-friendly price? I dimly recall that these tapes would be 1600 BPI.
I have several functional 9-track drives here, though none are hooked
up at the moment due to a physical reorganization in-progress here. I
expect to have one up and running in the next week or so, though, and
can certainly help you out.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 2013-12-30 17:29, lee.gleason at comcast.net wrote:
It's my month for trying to read old media. I've been going through
my collection to try and eliminate bulky things I won't be using. I came
across around 10 reel to reel mag tapes from RSX and VMS, from my early
DEC career, that I would like to see about getting copied to SIMH tape
format.
Does anyone on the list here in the US still have a working 9 track
tape drive on their systems, that would be willing to convert these at a
hobbyist-friendly price? I dimly recall that these tapes would be 1600 BPI.
I bet there are some. But in case noone turns up, and you have plenty of
time, it could be solved this summer in Sweden...
Johnny
I have one in Sunnyvale....
-P
On 2013-12-30 17:29, lee.gleason at comcast.net wrote:
It's my month for trying to read old media. I've been going through
my collection to try and eliminate bulky things I won't be using. I came
across around 10 reel to reel mag tapes from RSX and VMS, from my early
DEC career, that I would like to see about getting copied to SIMH tape
format.
Does anyone on the list here in the US still have a working 9 track
tape drive on their systems, that would be willing to convert these at a
hobbyist-friendly price? I dimly recall that these tapes would be 1600 BPI.
I bet there are some. But in case noone turns up, and you have plenty of time, it could be solved this summer in Sweden...
Johnny
It's my month for trying to read old media. I've been going through my collection to try and eliminate bulky things I won't be using. I came across around 10 reel to reel mag tapes from RSX and VMS, from my early DEC career, that I would like to see about getting copied to SIMH tape format.
Does anyone on the list here in the US still have a working 9 track tape drive on their systems, that would be willing to convert these at a hobbyist-friendly price? I dimly recall that these tapes would be 1600 BPI.
--
Lee K. Gleason N5ZMR
Control-G Consultants
lee.gleason at comcast.net
I believe that the prints for the H7150 are in the Field Maintenance Print Set
Manx
DECwriter III LA120 Operator Reference Card, 1978
LA120 Technical Manual, January, 1980
LA120 User Guide, May, 1984
LA120 Field Maintenance Print Set, October, 1979
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Afternoon,
I've managed to acquire an LA120! Woohoo!
However, it had some issues...as was discussed when I got it. ;)
I've replaced the blown fuse, the there is continuity for the pico fuse on
the PSU...but I have no idea if that indicates it works or not. The only
thing that runs is the fan.
What are some test points I can try? Also...what is the value for the
picofuse? I have 125V 1.5A fuses...but I think it needs higher current.
I tested to see which voltages are preset:
+5
-12
-24.
No +12 or +24.
Anyone have full schematics for the H7110 PSU, or know enough about it to
help me debug this one?
Alternatively, I can get an H7150 for $95 on ebay. Can an H7150 be tossed
in an LA120-AA?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Afternoon,
I've managed to acquire an LA120! Woohoo!
However, it had some issues...as was discussed when I got it. ;)
I've replaced the blown fuse, the there is continuity for the pico fuse on
the PSU...but I have no idea if that indicates it works or not. The only
thing that runs is the fan.
What are some test points I can try? Also...what is the value for the
picofuse? I have 125V 1.5A fuses...but I think it needs higher current.
I tested to see which voltages are preset:
+5
-12
-24.
No +12 or +24.
Anyone have full schematics for the H7110 PSU, or know enough about it to
help me debug this one?
Alternatively, I can get an H7150 for $95 on ebay. Can an H7150 be tossed
in an LA120-AA?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2013-12-28 00:45, G ran hling wrote:
On 2013-12-25 16:59, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-12-25 14:44, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> writes:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info
on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source
for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead
flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525
nowadays. Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
At least you don't have to worry too much about the VT525. Almost any
VGA
monitor could be used with its base unit.
Yup. Really nice design there. Have LCD monitors for them.
Well, I have got one also. When I had it connected to a "generic" LCD, I
didn't enjoy the font...
When I , for testing purpouse, was writing a full line of $-signs, I
found out what was the problem;I got a cyclic pattern like
$$$$$$$SSSS$$$$$$$$SSSSSS ....
The horizontal adjustment of resolution vs. speed rendered this problem
that made alla characters to lose some column of dots at some places of
the screen, but not at other...
I nowdays have this excellent terminal connected to a traditional
"Trinitron" fat screen, where it comes to its best!
If you haven't realized it yet, it (obviously) depends on your LCD monitor. They are not all the same resolution, and when they convert, it sometimes sucks. With the right LCD, it works great. I have tried several, and with some of them, I got the same result you did.
A bit more difficult to locate good keyboards, though. Have plenty of
LK201 and similar, but the LK401 (or was it LK421?) are a bit more
scarce.
I did buy one new produced keyboard made by the company that aquired
production equipement when DEC stoped its production (that really never
was "in-house"). Works fine and has prpoer key-layout.
I might be able to find links etc at the bottom of my mail-box if you
can't get Google to find the source...
Boundless technology. But I think they were made in house by DEC originally. But DEC sold its terminal business in the great general sale, when they sold off almost everything.
Boundless acquired the terminal business, and I think they still sell the VT525 new.
Johnny
On 2013-12-25 16:59, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-12-25 14:44, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> writes:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525
nowadays. Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
At least you don't have to worry too much about the VT525. Almost any VGA
monitor could be used with its base unit.
Yup. Really nice design there. Have LCD monitors for them.
Well, I have got one also. When I had it connected to a "generic" LCD, I didn't enjoy the font...
When I , for testing purpouse, was writing a full line of $-signs, I found out what was the problem;I got a cyclic pattern like
$$$$$$$SSSS$$$$$$$$SSSSSS ....
The horizontal adjustment of resolution vs. speed rendered this problem that made alla characters to lose some column of dots at some places of the screen, but not at other...
I nowdays have this excellent terminal connected to a traditional "Trinitron" fat screen, where it comes to its best!
A bit more difficult to locate good keyboards, though. Have plenty of LK201 and similar, but the LK401 (or was it LK421?) are a bit more scarce.
I did buy one new produced keyboard made by the company that aquired production equipement when DEC stoped its production (that really never was "in-house"). Works fine and has prpoer key-layout.
I might be able to find links etc at the bottom of my mail-box if you can't get Google to find the source...
Johnny
G ran SM6NNC
Dave McGuire skrev 2013-12-24 05:14:
On 12/23/2013 10:46 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ahh, got it. I have a bru64k.tap file that I think came from the same
place. If you have a brusys.tap file, would you please send me a copy?
I can't seem to find that anywhere.
Did you try booting the BRU64K tape? Sounds like that should be a BRUSYS
system as well.
Not sure what the correct name is. I know it by BRUSYS, but there might
be some slight difference between the 11M and M+ standalone BRU, or it
might just be different versions of the same.
BRU64K also rings some bell, so I think I've seem that name as well.
I booted it. It seems BRU64K does not support MU: devices. The
"regular" BRUSYS does. I don't know what other differences there may be.
BRU64K "might" be able to fit into a system with merely 64 k RAM... (And might be older than your other BRU immage ...)
Ok. I was mainly concerned about the stuff fitting...I'm assuming
4.2/4.3 are larger than 4.1. 4.1 was the last version I ran.
I've found the relevant sections of the documentation and am reading
it now.
Excellent.
Progress! I've restored the DL installation set under simh, moved the
RL02 disk images over to a (real) VAX, written them to RL02 packs, and
am running a sysgen on a (real) PDP-11/24. It's midway through the
assembly of the executive. I took a crappy phone pic:
http://www.neurotica.com/misc/pdp1124-rsx-sysgen-20131223.jpg
(yes, that bottom RL02 really is dirty...I'll clean it soon)
I wish I still had that tape, but sadly it was lost many years ago.
Distribution tape for 4.1? I thought you had 4.3 anyway, so what would
you use 4.1 for?
I wouldn't...but it was a pristine, original DEC RSX-11M distribution
tape, and those don't exactly grow on trees.
Thank you Johnny. I'm sure I will have other questions as I become
reacquainted with RSX.
No problems. Feel free to ask anything.
Thank you!
First question: I'd like to try to get DECnet running on this system,
if possible, to get it on HECnet. I've never run DECnet under RSX
before. I could put a DEUNA in the machine, but I am running short of
slots. I have a DELUA, but I don't recall sysgen asking about DELUAs.
Are they compatible at the driver level? Meaning, if I re-do my sysgen
to include a DEUNA driver, will that work with a DELUA?
-Dave
As I remember the SYSGEN/NETGEN task, the controller intended for DECnet should NOT be taken into SYSGEN at all, but later, at the totally separate task of performing NETGEN once Your OS. is up and running, it should be included there. So, no need to redo your SYSGEN when playing with different Ethernet cards.
BTW: DELUA replaced DEUNA...
/G ran -SM6NNC
On 2013-12-25 17:22, Brian Hechinger wrote:
I've been lamenting the fact that I don't currently have a nice terminal. A vt525 really looks like an outstanding option. I should look into that.
In that case I cen definitely recommend the VT525.
What does the lk4xx get you that the lk2xx don't offer? I'm not that up on my dec keyboards anymore, sadly.
PS/2 connector. The VT500-series all have PS/2 connectors for the keyboard.
I think it's the LK421. The LK401 came with the VT420. It has a couple of new keys, but still have the modular plug. The LK421 looks the same as the LK401 but have a PS/2 connector instead.
The VT500-series can use any PC keyboard, but I prefer one with the proper key layout. :-)
Johnny
-brian
On Dec 25, 2013, at 10:59, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-12-25 14:44, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> writes:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525
nowadays. Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
At least you don't have to worry too much about the VT525. Almost any VGA
monitor could be used with its base unit.
Yup. Really nice design there. Have LCD monitors for them.
A bit more difficult to locate good keyboards, though. Have plenty of LK201 and similar, but the LK401 (or was it LK421?) are a bit more scarce.
Johnny
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-12-25 09:15, Cory Smelosky wrote:
changed mail server, testing spam-handling.
Please don't. If you want to test or figure something out, contact me instead.
I hate test mails to general lists.
Okay. Sorry about that. All tests done and passed anyway
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
I've been lamenting the fact that I don't currently have a nice terminal. A vt525 really looks like an outstanding option. I should look into that.
What does the lk4xx get you that the lk2xx don't offer? I'm not that up on my dec keyboards anymore, sadly.
-brian
On Dec 25, 2013, at 10:59, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-12-25 14:44, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> writes:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525
nowadays. Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
At least you don't have to worry too much about the VT525. Almost any VGA
monitor could be used with its base unit.
Yup. Really nice design there. Have LCD monitors for them.
A bit more difficult to locate good keyboards, though. Have plenty of LK201 and similar, but the LK401 (or was it LK421?) are a bit more scarce.
Johnny
On 2013-12-25 14:44, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> writes:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525
nowadays. Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
At least you don't have to worry too much about the VT525. Almost any VGA
monitor could be used with its base unit.
Yup. Really nice design there. Have LCD monitors for them.
A bit more difficult to locate good keyboards, though. Have plenty of LK201 and similar, but the LK401 (or was it LK421?) are a bit more scarce.
Johnny
Hello!
An excellent idea. I already lodged an appropriate complaint.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-12-25 09:15, Cory Smelosky wrote:
changed mail server, testing spam-handling.
Please don't. If you want to test or figure something out, contact me
instead. I hate test mails to general lists.
Johnny
On 2013-12-25 09:15, Cory Smelosky wrote:
changed mail server, testing spam-handling.
Please don't. If you want to test or figure something out, contact me instead. I hate test mails to general lists.
Johnny
Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> writes:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525
nowadays. Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
At least you don't have to worry too much about the VT525. Almost any VGA
monitor could be used with its base unit.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 03:38:28AM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525
nowadays. Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
Johnny
Update has a bunch with cracked flybacks. I did find an
Italian(?) reseller of replacements but we mever got arround
to ordering.
I could search for those old emails.
/p
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013, Gregg Levine wrote:
Cory see if the blasted thing has a serial number on it, and ask
Google. Worse thing that can happen is that the example will be
unknown to it.
Will do next time it's not working. It decided to work again.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead
flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525 nowadays.
Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-12-24 20:40, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 12:27 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
DEUNA and DELUA are the same from a program point of view. They have
different
microcode, but that is detected at runtime, and the right microcode is
loaded.
The rest work the same. They use the same drivers, both in DECnet and in
plain
RSX. (Yes, there is an ethernet driver for Unibus, that you can use if
you
have the controller, but do not want DECnet.)
What're the differences between the two again? I have a DEUNA for my
11/44 I still need to get rolling.
The DELUA is one board, while the DEUNA is two, I can tell you that much.
Right. In addition, the DEUNA have a PDP-11 at the heard, while the DELUA have
a 68K.
An -11 powering the NIC for a bigger -11. neat. ;)
So, at the microcode level, they are totally different.
The DELUA also have a better ethernet controller (a LANCE chip).
In short, the DELUA is improved in most ways. But it's fine details.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Hello!
The last time I had a monitor throw a spanner into its flyback, and
this was a long while ago, when I found out why they need them, it was
a problem to find a new one.
Then since the first repair firm fouled it up, the second stuffed a
generic inside and it continued to work for many more years.
(Actually they looked up what was the designated non manufacturer's
replacement number for it.)
Cory see if the blasted thing has a serial number on it, and ask
Google. Worse thing that can happen is that the example will be
unknown to it.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead
flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525 nowadays.
Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
Johnny
On 2013-12-25 03:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/24/2013 09:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have had a whole bunch of VT320 give up on me over the years. It's
always been the flyback... I think there might even be some info on the
net about it. And I think I've heard of people locating a source for new
flybacks.
Oh really? That would be great...I have at least two with dead flybacks.
*Heard of*. I have not ever fixed any myself. I'm running on VT525 nowadays. Also have some VT420, VT510 and VT520...
Johnny